Stéphanie Sigaut1, Benjamin Tremey, Alexandre Ouattara, Roland Couturier, Christian Taberlet, Stanislas Grassin-Delyle, Jean-Francois Dreyfus, Sylvie Schlumberger, Marc Fischler. 1. From the Department of Anesthesiology (S.Sigaut, B.T., S. Schlumberger, M.F.), Clinical Research Unit (J.-F.D.), Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care 2 (A.O.), University Hospital, Bordeaux, France; Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue (R.C.), Le Plessis-Robinson, France; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (C.T.), University Hospital, Besançon, France; and Laboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology (S.G.-D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of tranexamic acid (TA) is still an issue. The authors compared two doses of TA during cardiac surgery in a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized study. METHODS: Patients were stratified according to transfusion risk, then randomized to two TA doses: 10 mg/kg bolus followed by 1 mg·kg·h infusion (low dose) until the end of surgery or 30 mg/kg bolus followed by 16 mg·kg·h infusion (high dose). The primary endpoint was the incidence of blood product transfusion up to day 7. Secondary ones were incidences of transfusion for each type of blood product and amounts transfused, blood loss, repeat surgery, TA-related adverse events, and mortality. RESULTS: The low-dose group comprised 284 patients and the high-dose one 285. The primary endpoint was not significantly different between TA doses (63% for low dose vs. 60% for high dose; P = 0.3). With the high dose, a lower incidence of frozen plasma (18 vs. 26%; P = 0.03) and platelet concentrate (15 vs. 23%; P = 0.02) transfusions, lower amounts of blood products (2.5 ± 0.38 vs. 4.1 ± 0.39; P = 0.02), fresh frozen plasma (0.49 ± 0.14 vs.1.07 ± 0.14; P = 0.02), and platelet concentrates transfused (0.50 ± 0.15 vs. 1.13 ± 0.15; P = 0.02), lower blood loss (590 ± 50.4 vs. 820 ± 50.7; P = 0.01), and less repeat surgery (2.5 vs. 6%; P = 0.01) were observed. These results are more marked in patients with a high risk for transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: A high dose of TA does not reduce incidence of blood product transfusion up to day 7, but is more effective than a low dose to decrease transfusion needs, blood loss, and repeat surgery.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of tranexamic acid (TA) is still an issue. The authors compared two doses of TA during cardiac surgery in a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized study. METHODS:Patients were stratified according to transfusion risk, then randomized to two TA doses: 10 mg/kg bolus followed by 1 mg·kg·h infusion (low dose) until the end of surgery or 30 mg/kg bolus followed by 16 mg·kg·h infusion (high dose). The primary endpoint was the incidence of blood product transfusion up to day 7. Secondary ones were incidences of transfusion for each type of blood product and amounts transfused, blood loss, repeat surgery, TA-related adverse events, and mortality. RESULTS: The low-dose group comprised 284 patients and the high-dose one 285. The primary endpoint was not significantly different between TA doses (63% for low dose vs. 60% for high dose; P = 0.3). With the high dose, a lower incidence of frozen plasma (18 vs. 26%; P = 0.03) and platelet concentrate (15 vs. 23%; P = 0.02) transfusions, lower amounts of blood products (2.5 ± 0.38 vs. 4.1 ± 0.39; P = 0.02), fresh frozen plasma (0.49 ± 0.14 vs.1.07 ± 0.14; P = 0.02), and platelet concentrates transfused (0.50 ± 0.15 vs. 1.13 ± 0.15; P = 0.02), lower blood loss (590 ± 50.4 vs. 820 ± 50.7; P = 0.01), and less repeat surgery (2.5 vs. 6%; P = 0.01) were observed. These results are more marked in patients with a high risk for transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: A high dose of TA does not reduce incidence of blood product transfusion up to day 7, but is more effective than a low dose to decrease transfusion needs, blood loss, and repeat surgery.
Authors: Kushagra Verma; Eitan Kohan; Christopher P Ames; Dana L Cruz; Vedat Deviren; Sigurd Berven; Thomas J Errico Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2015-11-19
Authors: Tobias Kammerer; Philipp Groene; Sophia R Sappel; Sven Peterss; Paula A Sa; Thomas Saller; Andreas Giebl; Patrick Scheiermann; Christian Hagl; Simon Thomas Schäfer Journal: Transfus Med Hemother Date: 2020-11-09 Impact factor: 3.747
Authors: Stephen M McHugh; Lavinia Kolarczyk; Robert S Lang; Lawrence M Wei; Marquez Jose; Kathirvel Subramaniam Journal: Indian J Anaesth Date: 2016-02
Authors: Michael M Neeki; Fanglong Dong; Jake Toy; Reza Vaezazizi; Joe Powell; Nina Jabourian; Alex Jabourian; David Wong; Richard Vara; Kathryn Seiler; Troy W Pennington; Joe Powell; Chris Yoshida-McMath; Shanna Kissel; Katharine Schulz-Costello; Jamish Mistry; Matthew S Surrusco; Karen R O'Bosky; Daved Van Stralen; Daniel Ludi; Karl Sporer; Peter Benson; Eugene Kwong; Richard Pitts; John T Culhane; Rodney Borger Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2017-04-19