BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The cannabinoid 1 (CB1 ) receptor inverse agonists/antagonists, rimonabant (SR141716, SR) and AM251, produce nausea and potentiate toxin-induced nausea by inverse agonism (rather than antagonism) of the CB1 receptor. Here, we evaluated two phytocannabinoids, cannabidivarin (CBDV) and Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), for their ability to produce these behavioural effect characteristics of CB1 receptor inverse agonism in rats. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In experiment 1, we investigated the potential of THCV and CBDV to produce conditioned gaping (measure of nausea-induced behaviour) in the same manner as SR and AM251. In experiment 2, we investigated the potential of THCV and CBDV to enhance conditioned gaping produced by a toxin in the same manner as CB1 receptor inverse agonists. KEY RESULTS: SR (10 and 20 mg·kg(-1) ) and AM251 (10 mg·kg(-1) ) produced conditioned gaping; however, THCV (10 or 20 mg·kg(-1) ) and CBDV (10 or 200 mg·kg(-1) ) did not. At a subthreshold dose for producing nausea, SR (2.5 mg·kg(-1) ) enhanced lithium chloride (LiCl)-induced conditioned gaping, whereas Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, 2.5 and 10 mg·kg(-1) ), THCV (2.5 or 10 mg·kg(-1) ) and CBDV (2.5 or 200 mg·kg(-1) ) did not; in fact, THC (2.5 and 10 mg·kg(-1) ), THCV (10 mg·kg(-1) ) and CBDV (200 mg·kg(-1) ) suppressed LiCl-induced conditioned gaping, suggesting anti-nausea potential. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The pattern of findings indicates that neither THCV nor CBDV produced a behavioural profile characteristic of CB1 receptor inverse agonists. As well, these compounds may have therapeutic potential in reducing nausea.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The cannabinoid 1 (CB1 ) receptor inverse agonists/antagonists, rimonabant (SR141716, SR) and AM251, produce nausea and potentiate toxin-induced nausea by inverse agonism (rather than antagonism) of the CB1 receptor. Here, we evaluated two phytocannabinoids, cannabidivarin (CBDV) and Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), for their ability to produce these behavioural effect characteristics of CB1 receptor inverse agonism in rats. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In experiment 1, we investigated the potential of THCV and CBDV to produce conditioned gaping (measure of nausea-induced behaviour) in the same manner as SR and AM251. In experiment 2, we investigated the potential of THCV and CBDV to enhance conditioned gaping produced by a toxin in the same manner as CB1 receptor inverse agonists. KEY RESULTS:SR (10 and 20 mg·kg(-1) ) and AM251 (10 mg·kg(-1) ) produced conditioned gaping; however, THCV (10 or 20 mg·kg(-1) ) and CBDV (10 or 200 mg·kg(-1) ) did not. At a subthreshold dose for producing nausea, SR (2.5 mg·kg(-1) ) enhanced lithium chloride (LiCl)-induced conditioned gaping, whereas Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, 2.5 and 10 mg·kg(-1) ), THCV (2.5 or 10 mg·kg(-1) ) and CBDV (2.5 or 200 mg·kg(-1) ) did not; in fact, THC (2.5 and 10 mg·kg(-1) ), THCV (10 mg·kg(-1) ) and CBDV (200 mg·kg(-1) ) suppressed LiCl-induced conditioned gaping, suggesting anti-nausea potential. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The pattern of findings indicates that neither THCV nor CBDV produced a behavioural profile characteristic of CB1 receptor inverse agonists. As well, these compounds may have therapeutic potential in reducing nausea.
Authors: Adèle Thomas; Lesley A Stevenson; Kerrie N Wease; Martin R Price; Gemma Baillie; Ruth A Ross; Roger G Pertwee Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Luciano De Petrocellis; Alessia Ligresti; Aniello Schiano Moriello; Marco Allarà; Tiziana Bisogno; Stefania Petrosino; Colin G Stott; Vincenzo Di Marzo Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: E M Rock; D Bolognini; C L Limebeer; M G Cascio; S Anavi-Goffer; P J Fletcher; R Mechoulam; R G Pertwee; L A Parker Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: K S Sink; K N Segovia; J Sink; P A Randall; L E Collins; M Correa; E J Markus; V K Vemuri; A Makriyannis; J D Salamone Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: S Frytak; C G Moertel; J R O'Fallon; J Rubin; E T Creagan; M J O'Connell; A J Schutt; N W Schwartau Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1979-12 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Erin M Rock; Cheryl L Limebeer; Jordan M Ward; Arianne Cohen; Katherine Grove; Micah J Niphakis; Benjamin F Cravatt; Linda A Parker Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-08-23 Impact factor: 4.530