Literature DB >> 23902394

DNA damage as a bivalve biomarker.

S A Steinert.   

Abstract

Bivalves have been used in numerous environmental assessment studies, chiefly because they are sessile deposit or suspension feeding organisms found in or near sites of environmental concern, and they can be easily collected, sorted and deployed at sites of interest. Monitoring studies utilizing bivalves currently rely on the comparison of growth, survival, and contaminant bioaccumulation. Data gathered from 'reference' sites are compared with those of populations at assessment sites. These studies require extended periods of exposure, lasting weeks to months, and the use of a well defined population of test organisms of similar size, age, and condition. In many cases time and resources require researchers to restrict their sampling to the organisms on-hand at a particular site without the benefit of any reference data. Therefore more versatile and sensitive assessment methods are needed. Because effects at higher levels of organization such as growth, development, and survival are initiated at the molecular and cellular levels attempts have been made to identify useful biomarkers at these levels. The proposed advantages of molecular/cellular biomarkers are that they will respond to stress predictably and more rapidly, and will be indicative of the mechanisms of toxicity thereby yielding a rudimentary characterization of the contaminant(s) influencing them. In the following communication we will report on past and current developments in the monitoring of DNAdamage as an environmental biomarker.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 23902394     DOI: 10.1080/135475099230651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomarkers        ISSN: 1354-750X            Impact factor:   2.658


  6 in total

1.  Biomarkers of environmental contaminants in field population of green mussel (Perna viridis) from Karnataka-Kerala coast (South West coast of India).

Authors:  P K Krishnakumar; Geetha Sasikumar; G S Bhat; D P K Asokan
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Evaluation of DNA damage in Chinese toad (Bufo bufo gargarizans) after in vivo exposure to sublethal concentrations of four herbicides using the comet assay.

Authors:  Xiao Hui Yin; Shao Nan Li; Le Zhang; Guo Nian Zhu; Hui Sheng Zhuang
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Assessing metal, protein, and DNA profiles in Labeo rohita from the Indus River in Mianwali, Pakistan.

Authors:  Abdul Shakoor Chaudhry; Farhat Jabeen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  DNA damage as a biomarker for assessing the effects of suspended solids on the orange-spotted grouper, Epinephelus coioides.

Authors:  C Y Tse; K M Chan; C K Wong
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2008-07-06       Impact factor: 2.794

5.  Genotoxicity of crude extracts of cyanobacteria from Taihu Lake on carp (Cyprinus carpio).

Authors:  Qin Wu; Mei Li; Xiangyu Gao; John P Giesy; Yibin Cui; Liuyan Yang; Zhiming Kong
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Assessment of genotoxicity in polluted freshwaters using caged painter's mussel, Unio pictorum.

Authors:  Anamaria Stambuk; Mirjana Pavlica; Goran Vignjević; Bruna Bolarić; Göran I V Klobucar
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 2.823

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.