PURPOSE: The gain in quantification precision that can be expected in human brain (1) H MRS at very high field remains a matter of debate. Here, we investigate this issue using Monte-Carlo simulations. METHODS: Simulated human brain-like (1) H spectra were fitted repeatedly with different noise realizations using LCModel at B0 ranging from 1.5T to 11.7T, assuming a linear increase in signal-to-noise ratio with B0 in the time domain, and assuming a linear increase in linewidth with B0 based on experimental measurements. Average quantification precision (Cramér-Rao lower bound) was then determined for each metabolite as a function of B0 . RESULTS: For singlets, Cramér-Rao lower bounds improved (decreased) by a factor of ∼ B0 as B0 increased, as predicted by theory. For most J-coupled metabolites, Cramér-Rao lower bounds decreased by a factor ranging from B0 to B0 as B0 increased, reflecting additional gains in quantification precision compared to singlets owing to simplification of spectral pattern and reduced overlap. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification precision of (1) H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in human brain continues to improve with B0 up to 11.7T although peak signal-to-noise ratio in the frequency domain levels off above 3T. In most cases, the gain in quantification precision is higher for J-coupled metabolites than for singlets.
PURPOSE: The gain in quantification precision that can be expected in human brain (1) H MRS at very high field remains a matter of debate. Here, we investigate this issue using Monte-Carlo simulations. METHODS: Simulated human brain-like (1) H spectra were fitted repeatedly with different noise realizations using LCModel at B0 ranging from 1.5T to 11.7T, assuming a linear increase in signal-to-noise ratio with B0 in the time domain, and assuming a linear increase in linewidth with B0 based on experimental measurements. Average quantification precision (Cramér-Rao lower bound) was then determined for each metabolite as a function of B0 . RESULTS: For singlets, Cramér-Rao lower bounds improved (decreased) by a factor of ∼ B0 as B0 increased, as predicted by theory. For most J-coupled metabolites, Cramér-Rao lower bounds decreased by a factor ranging from B0 to B0 as B0 increased, reflecting additional gains in quantification precision compared to singlets owing to simplification of spectral pattern and reduced overlap. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification precision of (1) H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in human brain continues to improve with B0 up to 11.7T although peak signal-to-noise ratio in the frequency domain levels off above 3T. In most cases, the gain in quantification precision is higher for J-coupled metabolites than for singlets.
Authors: Dinesh Kumar Deelchand; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Gregor Adriany; Isabelle Iltis; Peter Andersen; John P Strupp; J Thomas Vaughan; Kâmil Uğurbil; Pierre-Gilles Henry Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Robin A de Graaf; Peter B Brown; Scott McIntyre; Terence W Nixon; Kevin L Behar; Douglas L Rothman Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: R Gruetter; S A Weisdorf; V Rajanayagan; M Terpstra; H Merkle; C L Truwit; M Garwood; S L Nyberg; K Uğurbil Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Kejal Kantarci; Glenn Reynolds; Ronald C Petersen; Bradley F Boeve; David S Knopman; Steven D Edland; Glenn E Smith; Robert J Ivnik; Eric G Tangalos; Clifford R Jack Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: James M Joers; Dinesh K Deelchand; Anjali Kumar; Amir Moheet; Elizabeth Seaquist; Pierre-Gilles Henry; Gülin Öz Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Dinesh K Deelchand; Isaac M Adanyeguh; Uzay E Emir; Tra-My Nguyen; Romain Valabregue; Pierre-Gilles Henry; Fanny Mochel; Gülin Öz Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Melissa Terpstra; Ian Cheong; Tianmeng Lyu; Dinesh K Deelchand; Uzay E Emir; Petr Bednařík; Lynn E Eberly; Gülin Öz Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Stanislav Motyka; Philipp Moser; Lukas Hingerl; Gilbert Hangel; Eva Heckova; Bernhard Strasser; Korbinian Eckstein; Simon Daniel Robinson; Benedikt A Poser; Stephan Gruber; Siegfried Trattnig; Wolfgang Bogner Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Samaira Younis; Anders Hougaard; Casper E Christensen; Mark B Vestergaard; Esben T Petersen; Vincent O Boer; Olaf B Paulson; Messoud Ashina; Anouk Marsman; Henrik B W Larsson Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 4.677