Literature DB >> 23900761

A note on calculating asymptotic confidence intervals for the adjusted risk difference and number needed to treat in the Cox regression model.

Ruediger P Laubender1, Ralf Bender.   

Abstract

Recently, Laubender and Bender (Stat. Med. 2010; 29: 851-859) applied the average risk difference (RD) approach to estimate adjusted RD and corresponding number needed to treat measures in the Cox proportional hazards model. We calculated standard errors and confidence intervals by using bootstrap techniques. In this paper, we develop asymptotic variance estimates of the adjusted RD measures and corresponding asymptotic confidence intervals within the counting process theory and evaluated them in a simulation study. We illustrate the use of the asymptotic confidence intervals by means of data of the Düsseldorf Obesity Mortality Study.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  Cox proportional hazards regression; adjustment; confidence intervals; confounding; counting process; exposure impact number (EIN); number needed to be exposed (NNE); number needed to treat (NNT); risk difference (RD)

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23900761     DOI: 10.1002/sim.5913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  2 in total

1.  Number needed to treat (NNT) in clinical literature: an appraisal.

Authors:  Diogo Mendes; Carlos Alves; Francisco Batel-Marques
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  The number needed to treat adjusted for explanatory variables in regression and survival analysis: Theory and application.

Authors:  Valentin Vancak; Yair Goldberg; Stephen Z Levine
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.497

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.