| Literature DB >> 23900761 |
Ruediger P Laubender1, Ralf Bender.
Abstract
Recently, Laubender and Bender (Stat. Med. 2010; 29: 851-859) applied the average risk difference (RD) approach to estimate adjusted RD and corresponding number needed to treat measures in the Cox proportional hazards model. We calculated standard errors and confidence intervals by using bootstrap techniques. In this paper, we develop asymptotic variance estimates of the adjusted RD measures and corresponding asymptotic confidence intervals within the counting process theory and evaluated them in a simulation study. We illustrate the use of the asymptotic confidence intervals by means of data of the Düsseldorf Obesity Mortality Study.Keywords: Cox proportional hazards regression; adjustment; confidence intervals; confounding; counting process; exposure impact number (EIN); number needed to be exposed (NNE); number needed to treat (NNT); risk difference (RD)
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23900761 DOI: 10.1002/sim.5913
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stat Med ISSN: 0277-6715 Impact factor: 2.373