Literature DB >> 23900664

Time to tweak the TTO: results from a comparison of alternative specifications of the TTO.

Matthijs M Versteegh1, Arthur E Attema, Mark Oppe, Nancy J Devlin, Elly A Stolk.   

Abstract

This article examines the effect that different specifications of the time trade-off (TTO) valuation task may have on values for EQ-5D-5L health states. The new variants of the TTO, namely lead-time TTO and lag-time TTO, along with the classic approach to TTO were compared using two durations for the health states (15 and 20 years). The study tested whether these methods yield comparable health-state values. TTO tasks were administered online. It was found that lag-time TTO produced lower values than lead-time TTO and that the difference was larger in the longer time frame. Classic TTO values most resembled those of the lag-time TTO in a 20-year time frame in terms of mean absolute difference. The relative importance of different domains of health was systematically affected by the duration of the health state. In the tasks with a 10-year health-state duration, anxiety/depression had the largest negative impact on health-state values; in the tasks with a 5-year duration, the pain/discomfort domain had the largest negative impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23900664      PMCID: PMC3728436          DOI: 10.1007/s10198-013-0507-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  17 in total

1.  Lead time TTO: leading to better health state valuations?

Authors:  Arthur E Attema; Matthijs M Versteegh; Mark Oppe; Werner B F Brouwer; Elly A Stolk
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Learning effects in time trade-off based valuation of EQ-5D health states.

Authors:  Liv Ariane Augestad; Kim Rand-Hendriksen; Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen; Knut Stavem
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  Comparing the results of applying different methods of eliciting time preferences for health.

Authors:  Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2002

4.  Exploring challenges to TTO utilities: valuing states worse than dead.

Authors:  Angela Robinson; Anne Spencer
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  A uniform time trade off method for states better and worse than dead: feasibility study of the 'lead time' approach.

Authors:  Nancy J Devlin; Aki Tsuchiya; Ken Buckingham; Carl Tilling
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Does mode of administration matter? Comparison of online and face-to-face administration of a time trade-off task.

Authors:  Richard Norman; Madeleine T King; Dushyant Clarke; Rosalie Viney; Paula Cronin; Deborah Street
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets.

Authors:  Ben van Hout; M F Janssen; You-Shan Feng; Thomas Kohlmann; Jan Busschbach; Dominik Golicki; Andrew Lloyd; Luciana Scalone; Paul Kind; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states.

Authors:  P Dolan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Persons vs years: two ways of eliciting implicit weights.

Authors:  J A Olsen
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Canadian valuation of EQ-5D health states: preliminary value set and considerations for future valuation studies.

Authors:  Nick Bansback; Aki Tsuchiya; John Brazier; Aslam Anis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Increasing respondent engagement in composite time trade-off tasks by imposing three minimum trade-offs to improve data quality.

Authors:  Ruixuan Jiang; Thomas Kohlmann; Todd A Lee; Axel Mühlbacher; James Shaw; Surrey Walton; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-08-28

2.  Valuing EQ-5D-Y: the current state of play.

Authors:  N Devlin; T Pan; S Kreimeier; J Verstraete; E Stolk; K Rand; M Herdman
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods.

Authors:  Arthur E Attema; Yvette Edelaar-Peeters; Matthijs M Versteegh; Elly A Stolk
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07

4.  Introducing the composite time trade-off: a test of feasibility and face validity.

Authors:  Bas M F Janssen; Mark Oppe; Matthijs M Versteegh; Elly A Stolk
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07

5.  Influenced from the start: anchoring bias in time trade-off valuations.

Authors:  Liv Ariane Augestad; Knut Stavem; Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen; Carl Haakon Samuelsen; Kim Rand-Hendriksen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  EuroQol Protocols for Time Trade-Off Valuation of Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Mark Oppe; Kim Rand-Hendriksen; Koonal Shah; Juan M Ramos-Goñi; Nan Luo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  A Computer-Assisted Personal Interview App in Research Electronic Data Capture for Administering Time Trade-off Surveys (REDCap): Development and Pretest.

Authors:  Mark Oremus; Anis Sharafoddini; Gian Paolo Morgano; Xuejing Jin; Feng Xie
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2018-01-23

8.  US population norms for the EQ-5D-5L and comparison of norms from face-to-face and online samples.

Authors:  Ruixuan Jiang; M F Bas Janssen; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off.

Authors:  Ruixuan Jiang; James Shaw; Axel Mühlbacher; Todd A Lee; Surrey Walton; Thomas Kohlmann; Richard Norman; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 4.147

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.