BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A simple screening tool is needed as an aid to optimize management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The purpose of this study was to design a simple index that could be used to predict the presence of NAFLD. METHODS: A cross-sectional case-control study design was used for this study with 6,926 subjects who had received health assessments. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis indicated that body mass index (BMI), triglyceride (TG), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) to aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ratio (ALT/AST ratio), and hyperglycemia (HG) were independent risk factors for NAFLD. These variables were used to construct a fatty liver disease (FLD) index: FLD index = BMI + TG + 3 × (ALT/AST ratio) + 2 × HG (presence of HG, HG = 1; absence of HG, HG = 0). The FLD index had an area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.819 in the training set and 0.817 in the validation set. Values of the FLD index <28.0 or >37.0 excluded the possibility of NAFLD with sensitivity of 94.9 % or detected NAFLD with specificity of 96.0 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The FLD index is a simple, efficient NAFLD screening tool for the Chinese population that may be used to select people for further analysis and/or treatment, and/or for lifestyle modification.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A simple screening tool is needed as an aid to optimize management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The purpose of this study was to design a simple index that could be used to predict the presence of NAFLD. METHODS: A cross-sectional case-control study design was used for this study with 6,926 subjects who had received health assessments. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis indicated that body mass index (BMI), triglyceride (TG), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) to aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ratio (ALT/AST ratio), and hyperglycemia (HG) were independent risk factors for NAFLD. These variables were used to construct a fatty liver disease (FLD) index: FLD index = BMI + TG + 3 × (ALT/AST ratio) + 2 × HG (presence of HG, HG = 1; absence of HG, HG = 0). The FLD index had an area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.819 in the training set and 0.817 in the validation set. Values of the FLD index <28.0 or >37.0 excluded the possibility of NAFLD with sensitivity of 94.9 % or detected NAFLD with specificity of 96.0 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The FLD index is a simple, efficient NAFLD screening tool for the Chinese population that may be used to select people for further analysis and/or treatment, and/or for lifestyle modification.
Authors: Tobias Kurth; Alexander M Walker; Robert J Glynn; K Arnold Chan; J Michael Gaziano; Klaus Berger; James M Robins Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-12-21 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: M Graif; M Yanuka; M Baraz; A Blank; M Moshkovitz; A Kessler; T Gilat; J Weiss; E Walach; P Amazeen; C S Irving Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Sang Won Lee; Seong Ho Park; Kyoung Won Kim; Eugene K Choi; Yong Moon Shin; Pyo Nyun Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee; Eun Sil Yu; Shin Hwang; Sung-Gyu Lee Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Michelle T Long; Alison Pedley; Lisandro D Colantonio; Joseph M Massaro; Udo Hoffmann; Paul Muntner; Caroline S Fox Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Richard K Sterling; Wendy C King; Mandana Khalili; David E Kleiner; Amanda S Hinerman; Mark Sulkowski; Raymond T Chung; Mamta K Jain; M Auricio Lisker-Melman; David K Wong; Marc G Ghany Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 3.487
Authors: Ángel Arturo López-González; Zoe Manzanero; Hilda María González San Miguel; Sebastiana Arroyo Bote; Pere Riutord Sbert; María Del Mar Rigo Vives; José Ignacio Ramírez Manent Journal: J Occup Health Date: 2022-01 Impact factor: 2.570
Authors: Yura Ahn; Sung Cheol Yun; Seung Soo Lee; Jung Hee Son; Sora Jo; Jieun Byun; Yu Sub Sung; Ho Sung Kim; Eun Sil Yu Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Xiaolin Huang; Min Xu; Ying Chen; Kui Peng; Ya Huang; Po Wang; Lin Ding; Lin Lin; Yu Xu; Yuhong Chen; Jieli Lu; Weiqing Wang; Yufang Bi; Guang Ning Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 1.817