Literature DB >> 23899895

Measured versus self-reported physical function in adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Webb A Smith1, Zhenghong Li, Mark Loftin, Brent E Carlyle, Melissa M Hudson, Leslie L Robison, Kirsten K Ness.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) experience late effects that interfere with physical function. Limitations in physical function can affect CCS abilities to actively participate in daily activities. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the concordance between self-reported physical performance and clinically evaluated physical performance among adult CCS.
METHODS: CCS 18 yr or older and 10 yr or older from diagnosis who are participants in the St. Jude Lifetime cohort study responded to the physical function section of the Medical Outcome Survey Short Form (SF-36). Measured physical performance was evaluated using the Physical Performance Test and the 6-Minute Walk Test.
RESULTS: Individuals (N = 1778, 50.8% female) with a median time since diagnosis of 24.9 yr (range = 10.9-48.2) and a median age of 32.4 yr (range = 19.1-48.2) completed testing. Limitations in physical performance were self-reported by 14.1% of participants. The accuracy of self-report physical performance was 0.87 when the SF-36 was compared with the 6-Minute Walk Test or the Physical Performance Test. Reporting inaccuracies most often involved reporting a physical performance limitation. Poor accuracy was associated with previous diagnosis of a bone or CNS tumor, lymphoma, older age, and large body size.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that self-report, using the physical performance subscale of the SF-36, correctly identifies CCS who do not have physical performance limitations. In contrast, this same measure is less able to identify individuals who have performance limitations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23899895      PMCID: PMC4128913          DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a65c73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  34 in total

Review 1.  SF-36 health survey update.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults.

Authors:  S J Jay
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Physical and performance measures for the identification of mild to moderate frailty.

Authors:  M Brown; D R Sinacore; E F Binder; W M Kohrt
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Functional limitations and disability among elders in the Framingham Study.

Authors:  M Kelly-Hayes; A M Jette; P A Wolf; R B D'Agostino; P M Odell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  An objective measure of physical function of elderly outpatients. The Physical Performance Test.

Authors:  D B Reuben; A L Siu
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Is the 6-minute walk test a reliable substitute for peak oxygen uptake in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?

Authors:  C Zugck; C Krüger; S Dürr; S H Gerber; A Haunstetter; K Hornig; W Kübler; M Haass
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-11

8.  Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease.

Authors:  R J Butland; J Pang; E R Gross; A A Woodcock; D M Geddes
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-05-29

9.  How measurement techniques influence estimates of disability in older populations.

Authors:  A M Jette
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Prognostic value of 6-minute walk corridor test in patients with mild to moderate heart failure: comparison with other methods of functional evaluation.

Authors:  Carlo Rostagno; Giuseppe Olivo; Marco Comeglio; Vieri Boddi; Michela Banchelli; Giorgio Galanti; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 15.534

View more
  5 in total

1.  Short and long-term impairments of cardiopulmonary fitness level in previous childhood cancer cases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vesile Yildiz Kabak; Patrick Calders; Tulin Duger; Jibril Mohammed; Eric van Breda
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Cumulative Burden of Chronic Health Conditions in Adult Survivors of Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma: A Report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael W Bishop; Kirsten K Ness; Chenghong Li; Wei Liu; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Wassim Chemaitilly; Kevin R Krull; Daniel M Green; Alberto S Pappo; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Daniel A Mulrooney
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  An investigation of methods to improve recall for the patient-reported outcome measurement in COPD patients: a pilot randomised control trial and feasibility study protocol.

Authors:  Sheree M S Smith; Stephen Jan; Joseph Descallar; Guy B Marks
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2019-07-18

Review 4.  Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Jens Lehmann; Maria Rothmund; David Riedl; Gerhard Rumpold; Vincent Grote; Michael J Fischer; Bernhard Holzner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Physical and functional performance assessment in pediatric oncology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Regine Söntgerath; Julia Däggelmann; Sabine V Kesting; Corina S Rueegg; Torge-Christian Wittke; Simon Reich; Katharina G Eckert; Sandra Stoessel; Carolina Chamorro-Viña; Joachim Wiskemann; Peter Wright; Anna Senn-Malashonak; Vanessa Oschwald; Anne-Marie Till; Miriam Götte
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.