OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate current fixation techniques in the operative fixation of distal humerus fractures, both with conventional and locked plating in both parallel and orthogonal orientation. METHODS: Twenty-eight upper extremities from 14 cadavers were prepared to create 4 implant testing constructs: Synthes locking plates (IMP1) (medial and posterolateral with lateral flange), Acumed parallel locking plates (IMP2), Smith & Nephew orthogonal locking plates (IMP3), and Synthes orthogonal 3.5-reconstruction plating (IMP4) (1 posterolateral and 1 medial). A 5-mm supracondylar osteotomy was made to simulate the fracture. Stiffness in axial and sagittal plane loading, fatigue properties (over 5000 cycles), and ultimate strength were determined for each construct by biomechanical testing. RESULTS: The parallel locking plates (IMP2) exhibited the highest stiffness in axial load and the highest ultimate strength (P < 0.05). No significant differences in sagittal plane stiffness and in the fatigue properties were seen across the locking plate groups, regardless of orientation. Locked plating constructs performed significantly better in all categories when compared with conventional nonlocked plating. Plastic deformation and implant loosening were the main modes of failure after ultimate strength test. CONCLUSION: Parallel locking plate configuration showed significantly higher stiffness to axial load and ultimate failure strength when compared with orthogonal locked and nonlocked plating. Locked plating configurations performed significantly better than nonlocked plating configurations, regardless of orientation. Although parallel orientation seems biomechanically superior, translation to the clinical setting may prove difficult when taking surrounding soft tissue and exposure into consideration.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate current fixation techniques in the operative fixation of distal humerus fractures, both with conventional and locked plating in both parallel and orthogonal orientation. METHODS: Twenty-eight upper extremities from 14 cadavers were prepared to create 4 implant testing constructs: Synthes locking plates (IMP1) (medial and posterolateral with lateral flange), Acumed parallel locking plates (IMP2), Smith & Nephew orthogonal locking plates (IMP3), and Synthes orthogonal 3.5-reconstruction plating (IMP4) (1 posterolateral and 1 medial). A 5-mm supracondylar osteotomy was made to simulate the fracture. Stiffness in axial and sagittal plane loading, fatigue properties (over 5000 cycles), and ultimate strength were determined for each construct by biomechanical testing. RESULTS: The parallel locking plates (IMP2) exhibited the highest stiffness in axial load and the highest ultimate strength (P < 0.05). No significant differences in sagittal plane stiffness and in the fatigue properties were seen across the locking plate groups, regardless of orientation. Locked plating constructs performed significantly better in all categories when compared with conventional nonlocked plating. Plastic deformation and implant loosening were the main modes of failure after ultimate strength test. CONCLUSION: Parallel locking plate configuration showed significantly higher stiffness to axial load and ultimate failure strength when compared with orthogonal locked and nonlocked plating. Locked plating configurations performed significantly better than nonlocked plating configurations, regardless of orientation. Although parallel orientation seems biomechanically superior, translation to the clinical setting may prove difficult when taking surrounding soft tissue and exposure into consideration.
Authors: Patrick A Varady; Christian von Rüden; Markus Greinwald; Sven Hungerer; Robert Pätzold; Peter Augat Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Philip B Kaiser; Erik T Newman; Christopher Haggerty; Paul T Appleton; John J Wixted; Michael J Weaver; Edward K Rodriguez Journal: Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Date: 2020-08-14