Literature DB >> 23899014

Symbolic data analysis to defy low signal-to-noise ratio in microarray data for breast cancer prognosis.

Lyamine Hedjazi1, Marie-Veronique Le Lann, Tatiana Kempowsky, Florence Dalenc, Joseph Aguilar-Martin, Gilles Favre.   

Abstract

Microarray profiling has recently generated the hope to gain new insights into breast cancer biology and thereby improve the performance of current prognostic tools. However, it also poses several serious challenges to classical data analysis techniques related to the characteristics of resulting data, mainly high dimensionality and low signal-to-noise ratio. Despite the tremendous research work performed to handle the first challenge in the feature selection framework, very little attention has been directed to address the second one. We propose in this article to address both issues simultaneously based on symbolic data analysis capabilities in order to derive more accurate genetic marker-based prognostic models. In particular, interval data representation is employed to model various uncertainties in microarray measurements. A recent feature selection algorithm that handles symbolic interval data is used then to derive a genetic signature. The predictive value of the derived signature is then assessed by following a rigorous experimental setup and compared with existing prognostic approaches in terms of predictive performance and estimated survival probability. It is shown that the derived signature (GenSym) performs significantly better than other prognostic models, including the 70-gene signature, St. Gallen, and National Institutes of Health criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23899014      PMCID: PMC3728725          DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  13 in total

1.  Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations.

Authors:  M L Lee; F C Kuo; G A Whitmore; J Sklar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression.

Authors:  William J Blake; Mads KAErn; Charles R Cantor; J J Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Quantitative noise analysis for gene expression microarray experiments.

Authors:  Y Tu; G Stolovitzky; U Klein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A protocol for building and evaluating predictors of disease state based on microarray data.

Authors:  Lodewyk F A Wessels; Marcel J T Reinders; Augustinus A M Hart; Cor J Veenman; Hongyue Dai; Yudong D He; Laura J van't Veer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Yixin Wang; Jan G M Klijn; Yi Zhang; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Maxime P Look; Fei Yang; Dmitri Talantov; Mieke Timmermans; Marion E Meijer-van Gelder; Jack Yu; Tim Jatkoe; Els M J J Berns; David Atkins; John A Foekens
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Feb 19-25       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Multiclass cancer diagnosis using tumor gene expression signatures.

Authors:  S Ramaswamy; P Tamayo; R Rifkin; S Mukherjee; C H Yeang; M Angelo; C Ladd; M Reich; E Latulippe; J P Mesirov; T Poggio; W Gerald; M Loda; E S Lander; T R Golub
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The 70-gene signature as a response predictor for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Marieke E Straver; Annuska M Glas; Juliane Hannemann; Jelle Wesseling; Marc J van de Vijver; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Harm van Tinteren; Laura J Van't Veer; Sjoerd Rodenhuis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis.

Authors:  Christos Sotiriou; Pratyaksha Wirapati; Sherene Loi; Adrian Harris; Steve Fox; Johanna Smeds; Hans Nordgren; Pierre Farmer; Viviane Praz; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Christine Desmedt; Denis Larsimont; Fatima Cardoso; Hans Peterse; Dimitry Nuyten; Marc Buyse; Marc J Van de Vijver; Jonas Bergh; Martine Piccart; Mauro Delorenzi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Simulation of microarray data with realistic characteristics.

Authors:  Matti Nykter; Tommi Aho; Miika Ahdesmäki; Pekka Ruusuvuori; Antti Lehmussola; Olli Yli-Harja
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.