Literature DB >> 23898861

Effects of continuous passaging on mineralization of MC3T3-E1 cells with improved osteogenic culture protocol.

Xiang-Zhen Yan1, Wanxun Yang, Fang Yang, Monique Kersten-Niessen, John A Jansen, Sanne K Both.   

Abstract

The murine-derived MC3T3-E1 cell line provided by the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) is a well-known osteogenic cell culture model system to test materials in vitro. However, the effect of passaging on its mineralization capacity has never been described and their culture supplements can be further optimized. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of the passage number and different osteogenic culture supplements, including ascorbic acid (AsAP) and dexamethasone (Dex) on the osteogenic capacity of MC3T3-E1 cells. This capacity was measured by the deposited calcium, the alkaline phosphatase activity, and the expression of osteogenic-related genes, including bone sialoprotein (BSP), osteocalcin (OC), and osteopontin (OPN). The results indicated that the mineralization capacity of MC3T3-E1 cells significantly decreased during passaging and got exhausted at passage 34, as assessed by measuring calcium deposition after 28 days of osteogenic induction. Moreover, the combination of AsAP and Dex triggered significantly more mineralization in MC3T3-E1 cells than the ATCC recommended addition of AsAP alone, as indicated by increased calcium deposition and higher expression of BSP and OPN. However, Dex alone could not trigger this effect, but only in combination with the AsAP, which indicates that Dex has no direct effect on mineralization. In conclusion, the passage number of MC3T3-E1 cells is of great importance and the use of cells above 30 passages should be avoided. In addition, the favored osteogenic supplements providing an improved osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells are the combination of AsAP and Dex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23898861     DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2012.0412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.056


  13 in total

1.  Vitamin D endocrine system and osteoblasts.

Authors:  Marjolein van Driel; Johannes P T M van Leeuwen
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-02-05

2.  CCL2, CCL5, and IGF-1 participate in the immunomodulation of osteogenesis during M1/M2 transition in vitro.

Authors:  Luis A Córdova; Florence Loi; Tzu-Hua Lin; Emmanuel Gibon; Jukka Pajarinen; Akira Nabeshima; Laura Lu; Zhenyu Yao; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) signalling enhances osteogenesis in UMR-106 cell line.

Authors:  Tamás Juhász; Csaba Matta; Éva Katona; Csilla Somogyi; Roland Takács; Tibor Hajdú; Solveig Lind Helgadottir; János Fodor; László Csernoch; Gábor Tóth; Éva Bakó; Dóra Reglődi; Andrea Tamás; Róza Zákány
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.444

4.  Tantalum coating on TiO2 nanotubes induces superior rate of matrix mineralization and osteofunctionality in human osteoblasts.

Authors:  Christine J Frandsen; Karla S Brammer; Kunbae Noh; Gary Johnston; Sungho Jin
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 7.328

5.  Increased osteoblast viability at alkaline pH in vitro provides a new perspective on bone regeneration.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Galow; Alexander Rebl; Dirk Koczan; Sebastian M Bonk; Werner Baumann; Jan Gimsa
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2017-02-27

6.  Dihydrotestosterone, a robust promoter of osteoblastic proliferation and differentiation: understanding of time-mannered and dose-dependent control of bone forming cells.

Authors:  Hnin Ei Thu; Isa Naina Mohamed; Zahid Hussain; Ahmad Nazrun Shuid
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.699

7.  The Osteogenic and Tenogenic Differentiation Potential of C3H10T1/2 (Mesenchymal Stem Cell Model) Cultured on PCL/PLA Electrospun Scaffolds in the Absence of Specific Differentiation Medium.

Authors:  Timothée Baudequin; Ludovic Gaut; Marc Mueller; Angela Huepkes; Birgit Glasmacher; Delphine Duprez; Fahmi Bedoui; Cécile Legallais
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cells: A Reliable, Challenging Tool for In Vitro Osteogenesis and Bone Tissue Engineering Approaches.

Authors:  Ute Hempel; Katrin Müller; Carolin Preissler; Carolin Noack; Sabine Boxberger; Peter Dieter; Martin Bornhäuser; Manja Wobus
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.443

9.  Predicting gene expression using morphological cell responses to nanotopography.

Authors:  Marie F A Cutiongco; Bjørn Sand Jensen; Paul M Reynolds; Nikolaj Gadegaard
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Customizable, engineered substrates for rapid screening of cellular cues.

Authors:  Eline Huethorst; Marie Fa Cutiongco; Fraser A Campbell; Anwer Saeed; Rachel Love; Paul M Reynolds; Matthew J Dalby; Nikolaj Gadegaard
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 9.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.