Literature DB >> 23898821

Comparison of SILAC and mTRAQ quantification for phosphoproteomics on a quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer.

Felix S Oppermann1, Martin Klammer, Caroline Bobe, Jürgen Cox, Christoph Schaab, Andreas Tebbe, Henrik Daub.   

Abstract

Advances in mass spectrometric methodology and instrumentation have promoted a continuous increase in analytical performance in the field of phosphoproteomics. Here, we employed the recently introduced quadrupole Orbitrap (Q Exactive) mass spectrometer for quantitative signaling analysis to a depth of more than 15 000 phosphorylation sites. In parallel to the commonly used SILAC approach, we evaluated the nonisobaric chemical labeling reagent mTRAQ as an alternative quantification technique. Both enabled high phosphoproteome coverage in H3122 lung cancer cells. Replicate quantifications by mTRAQ identified almost as many significant phosphorylation changes upon treatment with ALK kinase inhibitor crizotinib as found by SILAC quantification. Overall, mTRAQ was slightly less precise than SILAC as evident from a somewhat higher variance of replicate phosphosite ratios. Direct comparison of SILAC- and mTRAQ-quantified phosphosites revealed that the majority of changes were detected by either quantification techniques, but also highlighted the aspect of false negative identifications in quantitative proteomics applications. Further inspection of crizotinib-regulated phosphorylation changes unveiled interference with multiple antioncogenic mechanisms downstream of ALK fusion kinase in H3122 cells. In conclusion, our results demonstrate a strong analytical performance of the Q Exactive in global phosphoproteomics, and establish mTRAQ quantification as a useful alternative to metabolic isotope labeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23898821     DOI: 10.1021/pr400417g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  11 in total

1.  Peptide dimethylation: fragmentation control via distancing the dimethylamino group.

Authors:  Adam J McShane; Yuanyuan Shen; Mary Joan Castillo; Xudong Yao
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  mTMT: An Alternative, Nonisobaric, Tandem Mass Tag Allowing for Precursor-Based Quantification.

Authors:  Joao A Paulo; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Sensing Small Changes in Protein Abundance: Stimulation of Caco-2 Cells by Human Whey Proteins.

Authors:  Judy K Cundiff; Elizabeth J McConnell; Kimberly J Lohe; Sarah D Maria; Robert J McMahon; Qiang Zhang
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Super Heavy TMTpro Labeling Reagent: An Alternative and Higher-Charge-State-Amenable Stable-Isotope-Labeled TMTpro Variant.

Authors:  Alban Ordureau; Qing Yu; Ryan D Bomgarden; John C Rogers; J Wade Harper; Steven P Gygi; Joao A Paulo
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 5.  Proteomics of protein post-translational modifications implicated in neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Ru-Jing Ren; Eric B Dammer; Gang Wang; Nicholas T Seyfried; Allan I Levey
Journal:  Transl Neurodegener       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 8.014

6.  An atlas of human kinase regulation.

Authors:  David Ochoa; Mindaugas Jonikas; Robert T Lawrence; Bachir El Debs; Joel Selkrig; Athanasios Typas; Judit Villén; Silvia Dm Santos; Pedro Beltrao
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 11.429

7.  Large-scale label-free comparative proteomics analysis of polo-like kinase 1 inhibition via the small-molecule inhibitor BI 6727 (Volasertib) in BRAF(V600E) mutant melanoma cells.

Authors:  Brian D Cholewa; Molly C Pellitteri-Hahn; Cameron O Scarlett; Nihal Ahmad
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Comparing SILAC- and stable isotope dimethyl-labeling approaches for quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Ho-Tak Lau; Hyong Won Suh; Martin Golkowski; Shao-En Ong
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 9.  Phosphoproteomics in the Age of Rapid and Deep Proteome Profiling.

Authors:  Nicholas M Riley; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Quantitative Phosphoproteomics Analysis of ERBB3/ERBB4 Signaling.

Authors:  Sebastian K Wandinger; Idoya Lahortiga; Kris Jacobs; Martin Klammer; Nicole Jordan; Sarah Elschenbroich; Marc Parade; Edgar Jacoby; Joannes T M Linders; Dirk Brehmer; Jan Cools; Henrik Daub
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.