Literature DB >> 23898204

An integrated reweighting theory of perceptual learning.

Barbara Anne Dosher1, Pamela Jeter, Jiajuan Liu, Zhong-Lin Lu.   

Abstract

Improvements in performance on visual tasks due to practice are often specific to a retinal position or stimulus feature. Many researchers suggest that specific perceptual learning alters selective retinotopic representations in early visual analysis. However, transfer is almost always practically advantageous, and it does occur. If perceptual learning alters location-specific representations, how does it transfer to new locations? An integrated reweighting theory explains transfer over retinal locations by incorporating higher level location-independent representations into a multilevel learning system. Location transfer is mediated through location-independent representations, whereas stimulus feature transfer is determined by stimulus similarity at both location-specific and location-independent levels. Transfer to new locations/positions differs fundamentally from transfer to new stimuli. After substantial initial training on an orientation discrimination task, switches to a new location or position are compared with switches to new orientations in the same position, or switches of both. Position switches led to the highest degree of transfer, whereas orientation switches led to the highest levels of specificity. A computational model of integrated reweighting is developed and tested that incorporates the details of the stimuli and the experiment. Transfer to an identical orientation task in a new position is mediated via more broadly tuned location-invariant representations, whereas changing orientation in the same position invokes interference or independent learning of the new orientations at both levels, reflecting stimulus dissimilarity. Consistent with single-cell recording studies, perceptual learning alters the weighting of both early and midlevel representations of the visual system.

Keywords:  Hebbian models; reweighting models

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23898204      PMCID: PMC3746919          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1312552110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  47 in total

1.  Mechanisms of generalization in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Z Liu; D Weinshall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Perceptual learning improves contrast sensitivity of V1 neurons in cats.

Authors:  Tianmiao Hua; Pinglei Bao; Chang-Bing Huang; Zhenhua Wang; Jinwang Xu; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Improvement in line orientation discrimination is retinally local but dependent on cognitive set.

Authors:  L P Shiu; H Pashler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

4.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity.

Authors:  T Poggio; M Fahle; S Edelman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Jean-Pierre Changeux; Lionel Naccache; Jérôme Sackur; Claire Sergent
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Perceptual learning without feedback in non-stationary contexts: data and model.

Authors:  Alexander A Petrov; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The role of feedback in learning a vernier discrimination task.

Authors:  M H Herzog; M Fahle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination.

Authors:  K Ball; R Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Human perceptual learning in identifying the oblique orientation: retinotopy, orientation specificity and monocularity.

Authors:  A A Schoups; R Vogels; G A Orban
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Physiological correlates of perceptual learning in monkey V1 and V2.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Ghose; Tianming Yang; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  48 in total

1.  Alpha-band EEG activity in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Brett C Bays; Kristina M Visscher; Christophe C Le Dantec; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Augmented Hebbian reweighting accounts for accuracy and induced bias in perceptual learning with reverse feedback.

Authors:  Jiajuan Liu; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Visual recovery in cortical blindness is limited by high internal noise.

Authors:  Matthew R Cavanaugh; Ruyuan Zhang; Michael D Melnick; Anasuya Das; Mariel Roberts; Duje Tadin; Marisa Carrasco; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Exogenous attention facilitates location transfer of perceptual learning.

Authors:  Ian Donovan; Sarit Szpiro; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Rapid and long-lasting reduction of crowding through training.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Jiageng Chen; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Confidence-based integrated reweighting model of task-difficulty explains location-based specificity in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Bharath Chandra Talluri; Shao-Chin Hung; Aaron R Seitz; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Deep Neural Networks for Modeling Visual Perceptual Learning.

Authors:  Li K Wenliang; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Learning one task by interleaving practice with another task.

Authors:  Sarit F A Szpiro; Beverly A Wright; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Vernier perceptual learning transfers to completely untrained retinal locations after double training: a "piggybacking" effect.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Jun-Yun Zhang; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi; Cong Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Practice improves peri-saccadic shape judgment but does not diminish target mislocalization.

Authors:  Yuval Porat; Ehud Zohary
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.