Literature DB >> 23896885

The comet assay: assessment of in vitro and in vivo DNA damage.

Mahima Bajpayee1, Ashutosh Kumar, Alok Dhawan.   

Abstract

Rapid industrialization and pursuance of a better life have led to an increase in the amount of chemicals in the environment, which are deleterious to human health. Pesticides, automobile exhausts, and new chemical entities all add to air pollution and have an adverse effect on all living organisms including humans. Sensitive test systems are thus required for accurate hazard identification and risk assessment. The Comet assay has been used widely as a simple, rapid, and sensitive tool for assessment of DNA damage in single cells from both in vitro and in vivo sources as well as in humans. Already, the in vivo comet assay has gained importance as the preferred test for assessing DNA damage in animals for some international regulatory guidelines. The advantages of the in vivo comet assay are its ability to detect DNA damage in any tissue, despite having non-proliferating cells, and its sensitivity to detect genotoxicity. The recommendations from the international workshops held for the comet assay have resulted in establishment of guidelines. The in vitro comet assay conducted in cultured cells and cell lines can be used for screening large number of compounds and at very low concentrations. The in vitro assay has also been automated to provide a high-throughput screening method for new chemical entities, as well as environmental samples. This chapter details the in vitro comet assay using the 96-well plate and in vivo comet assay in multiple organs of the mouse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23896885     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-529-3_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  8 in total

1.  Novel therapeutic combination demonstrates more than additive effects in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Brittany O'Neill Dulmage; Sara K Story; Louis D Falo; Larisa J Geskin
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2015-01-21

2.  Prevention of DNA damage in Barrett's esophageal cells exposed to acidic bile salts.

Authors:  Vikas Bhardwaj; Andela Horvat; Olga Korolkova; Mary K Washington; Wael El-Rifai; Sergey I Dikalov; Alexander I Zaika
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  Prevention of Aflatoxin B₁-Induced DNA Breaks by β-D-Glucan.

Authors:  Eduardo Madrigal-Bujaidar; José Antonio Morales-González; Manuel Sánchez-Gutiérrez; Jeannett A Izquierdo-Vega; Alicia Reyes-Arellano; Isela Álvarez-González; Ricardo Pérez-Pasten; Eduardo Madrigal-Santillán
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 4.546

4.  High-throughput screening platform for engineered nanoparticle-mediated genotoxicity using CometChip technology.

Authors:  Christa Watson; Jing Ge; Joel Cohen; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Bevin P Engelward; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Effects of Laser Printer-Emitted Engineered Nanoparticles on Cytotoxicity, Chemokine Expression, Reactive Oxygen Species, DNA Methylation, and DNA Damage: A Comprehensive in Vitro Analysis in Human Small Airway Epithelial Cells, Macrophages, and Lymphoblasts.

Authors:  Sandra V Pirela; Isabelle R Miousse; Xiaoyan Lu; Vincent Castranova; Treye Thomas; Yong Qian; Dhimiter Bello; Lester Kobzik; Igor Koturbash; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  DNA damage effects of inhalation anesthetics in human bronchoalveolar cells.

Authors:  Zafer Cukurova; Halil Cetingok; Sukru Ozturk; Asuman Gedikbasi; Oya Hergunsel; Derya Ozturk; Burak Don; Kivanc Cefle; Sukru Palanduz; Devrimsel Harika Ertem
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Upregulation of DNA repair genes and cell extrusion underpin the remarkable radiation resistance of Trichoplax adhaerens.

Authors:  Angelo Fortunato; Alexis Fleming; Athena Aktipis; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 8.  Nanoparticles: Weighing the Pros and Cons from an Eco-genotoxicological Perspective.

Authors:  Preeyaporn Koedrith; Md Mujibur Rahman; Yu Jin Jang; Dong Yeop Shin; Young Rok Seo
Journal:  J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.