Literature DB >> 23895783

Comparison and implications of PM₂.₅ carbon fractions in different environments.

Chong-Shu Zhu1, Jun-Ji Cao, Chuen-Jinn Tsai, Zhen-Xing Shen, Yong-Ming Han, Sui-Xin Liu, Zhu-Zi Zhao.   

Abstract

The concentrations of PM₂.₅ carbon fractions in rural, urban, tunnel and remote environments were measured using the IMPROVE thermal optical reflectance (TOR) method. The highest OC1 and EC1 concentrations were found for tunnel samples, while the highest OC2, OC3, and OC4 concentrations were observed for urban winter samples, respectively. The lowest levels of most carbon fractions were found for remote samples. The percentage contributions of carbon fractions to total carbon (TC) were characterized by one peak (at rural and remote sites) and two peaks (at urban and tunnel sites) with different carbon fractions, respectively. The abundance of char in tunnel and urban environments was observed, which might partly be due to traffic-related tire-wear. Various percentages of optically scattering OC and absorbing EC fractions to TC were found in the four different environments. In addition, the contribution of heating carbon fractions (char and soot) indicated various warming effects per unit mass of TC. The ratios of OC/EC and char/soot at the sites were shown to be source indicators. The investigation of carbon fractions at different sites may provide some information for improving model parameters in estimating their radiative effects.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Char/soot; Elemental carbon; OC/EC; Organic carbon; PM(2.5)

Year:  2013        PMID: 23895783     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

1.  Size distribution characteristics of carbonaceous aerosol in Xishuangbanna, southwest China: a sign for biomass burning in Asia.

Authors:  Yuhong Guo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  The rural carbonaceous aerosols in coarse, fine, and ultrafine particles during haze pollution in northwestern China.

Authors:  Chong-Shu Zhu; Jun-Ji Cao; Chuen-Jinn Tsai; Zhen-Xing Shen; Sui-Xin Liu; Ru-Jin Huang; Ning-ning Zhang; Ping Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Spatial and seasonal variations of atmospheric particulate carbon fractions and identification of secondary sources at urban sites in North India.

Authors:  Sailesh N Behera; Mukesh Sharma
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Seasonal variations in size distribution, water-soluble ions, and carbon content of size-segregated aerosols over New Delhi.

Authors:  Pawan Kumar; Sushil Kumar; Sudesh Yadav
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Effect of agriculture and vegetation on carbonaceous aerosol concentrations (PM2.5 and PM10) in Puszcza Borecka National Nature Reserve (Poland).

Authors:  Agnieszka Witkowska; Anita U Lewandowska; Dominika Saniewska; Lucyna M Falkowska
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.763

6.  Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on carbonaceous aerosols in a polluted city: Composition characterization, source apportionment, influence factors of secondary formation.

Authors:  Zhe Dong; Shenbo Wang; Jiabin Sun; Luqi Shang; Zihan Li; Ruiqin Zhang
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 8.943

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.