Literature DB >> 23895749

[Delayed gastric emptying after laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study].

Yong-bin Li1, Xin Wang, Ming-jun Wang, Zheng-guo Yang, Bing Peng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect on postoperative delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
METHODS: Data from 67 consecutive PD procedures performed between October 2010 and October 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 20 patients underwent laparoscopic PD (LPD group), and 47 patients underwent open PD (OPD group; 22 patients underwent pylorus-preserving PD, 25 patients underwent standard PD).
RESULTS: The LPD group had significantly longer operative times ((494 ± 46) minutes vs. (391 ± 70) minutes, t = -4.40, P = 0.000), reduced blood loss ((294 ± 158) ml. vs. (399 ± 68) ml, t = 2.73, P = 0.008) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (13.0 days vs. 16.3 days, t = 3.01, P = 0.009) compared to the OPD group. However, there was no difference in terms of DGE occurrence and postoperative complication rates. There was one postoperative death in the OPD group and none in the LPD group. Multivariate analysis by Logistic regression showed that DGE was significantly more frequent among patients with longer operative times (OR = 1.01, 95%CI: 1.000 - 1.024, P = 0.048), increased intraoperative blood loss (OR = 1.01, 95%CI: 1.000 - 1.022, P = 0.040) and postoperative intraabdominal complications (OR = 6.22, 95%CI: 1.400 - 27.700, P = 0.017). Mean postoperative hospital stay was longer among patients who developed DGE (19.7 days vs. 13.6 days, t = -6.50, P = 0.000) than those without DGE.
CONCLUSIONS: Longer operative time, increased intraoperative blood loss and postoperative intraabdominal complications appear to be risk factors for DGE development. Meanwhile, the laparoscopic approach PD is safe and feasible, and outcomes appears comparable with those undergoing an open approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23895749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 0529-5815


  5 in total

Review 1.  Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: What is the Best "Choice"? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Non-randomized Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Claudio Ricci; Riccardo Casadei; Giovanni Taffurelli; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Marco Ricciardiello; Francesco Minni
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus open approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; XiangHu Wu; Feng Zhu; Ming Shen; Rui Tian; ChengJian Shi; Xin Wang; GuangQin Xiao; XingJun Guo; Min Wang; RenYi Qin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Delayed Gastric Emptying (DGE) Following Total Pancreatectomy with Islet Auto Transplantation in Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis.

Authors:  George K John; Vikesh K Singh; Pankaj J Pasricha; Amitasha Sinha; Elham Afghani; Daniel Warren; Zhaoli Sun; Niraj Desai; Christi Walsh; Rita R Kalyani; Erica Hall; Kenzo Hirose; Martin A Makary; Ellen M Stein
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.

Authors:  Han Qin; Jianguo Qiu; Yiyang Zhao; Gang Pan; Yong Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Minimally invasive surgical approach versus open procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shunda Wang; Ning Shi; Lei You; Menghua Dai; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.