| Literature DB >> 23895583 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An increase in serum uric acid (UA) occurs during the early and middle stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and aggravates the deterioration of kidney function. This study aims to explore the relation between UA and endothelial dysfunction in early CKD and its mechanisms in a murine model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23895583 PMCID: PMC3750429 DOI: 10.1186/2047-783X-18-26
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Med Res ISSN: 0949-2321 Impact factor: 2.175
Figure 1Pathological pictures of rat kidneys from groups A, B, and C. (A) The normal renal glomerulus of group A (×400). (B) No obvious pathological change in renal tubules of group A (×400). (C, E) Mild glomerular mesangial proliferation in renal glomerulus of groups B and C (×400). (D, F) There were no obvious pathological changes in renal tubules in groups B and C (×400).
Concentration of Src, UA, P, NO, ET-1 and NO/ET-1 ratio in three groups (x̄±s)
| A | 30.20 ± 6.01 | 53.10 ± 8.62 | 12.90 ± 2.31 | 47.55 ± 5.39 | 5.89 ± 1.67 | 8.18 ± 2.32 |
| B | 31.70 ± 4.72 | 53.70 ± 11.52 | 12.97 ± 2.71 | 45.34 ± 4.76 | 5.92 ± 1.56 | 8.90 ± 3.55 |
| C | 30.80 ± 5.90 | 161.40 ± 28.04* | 22.38 ± 3.14* | 36.71 ± 3.45* | 7.50 ± 1.06△ | 5.07 ± 1.19* |
Note:
*: P <0.01 group C vs. groups A and B.
△: P <0.05 group C vs. groups A and B.
PCIPA: Percentage of collagen I positive area.
Figure 2Pathological images of rat arteries from groups A, B, and C. (A) Endothelial cells arranged in order under the vascular intima of group A (×400). (B) There was no obvious proliferation of medial smooth muscle cells in the vascular wall of group A (×200). (C) The morphology of endothelial cells of group B was slightly abnormal (×400). (D) There was no obvious proliferation of medial smooth muscle cells in the vascular wall of group B (×200). (E) Endothelial cells of group C had a foam-like change (×400). (F) Endothelial cells of group C shed from the vessel wall (×400). (G, H) Inflammatory cells accumulated in the vascular intima of group C (×400). (I) Neutrophil granulocytes were seen around the endothelial cells of group C (×400). (J) Mononuclear cells were seen around the endothelial cells of group C (×400). (K) Smooth muscle cells of group C proliferated, thickened, and had no order (×200).
Figure 3Collagen I staining of the vascular wall in groups A, B, and C. (A,B) A small amount of collagen I deposition was seen in the vascular wall of group A (×400). (C) Collagen I component was significantly increased in group C (×400).
Correlation between serum uric acid and P, NO, ET-1, and NO/ET-1 ratio in the vascular wall
| | ||
|---|---|---|
| PCIPA (%) | 0.8403 | 0.0023 |
| NO (μmol/L) | −0.9462 | 0.0000 |
| ET-1 (pg/mL) | 0.9374 | 0.0001 |
| NO/ET-1 ratio | −0.9230 | 0.0001 |
Correlation between Pin the vascular wall and NO, ET-1, and NO/ET-1 ratio
| | ||
|---|---|---|
| NO (μmol/L) | −0.9171 | 0.0002 |
| ET-1 (pg/mL) | 0.8737 | 0.0010 |
| NO/ET-1 ratio | −0.8707 | 0.0010 |
Concentration of serum SOD, MDA, CRP, ox-LDL, and LDL in the three groups (x̄±s)
| A | 249.80 ± 9.83 | 4.06 ± 0.28 | 10.43 ± 1.68 | 47.50 ± 11.51 | 0.18 ± 0.06 |
| B | 243.60 ± 8.11 | 4.04 ± 0.41 | 12.27 ± 2.76 | 53.31 ± 12.38 | 0.18 ± 0.06 |
| C | 224.40 ± 6.47*# | 4.40 ± 0.23△# | 14.68 ± 2.01△# | 65.22 ± 10.91△# | 0.25 ± 0.06△# |
Note:
*: P <0.01 group C vs. group B.
△: P <0.05 group C vs. group B.
#: P <0.01 group C vs. group A.
Correlation between serum UA, NO, ET-1, and NO/ET-1 ratio as well as P, SOD, MDA, CRP, ox-LDL, and LDL
| | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOD (U/mL) | −0.6885 | 0.0277 | 0.8179 | 0.0038 | −0.7793 | 0.0079 | 0.8143 | 0.0041 | −0.8180 | 0.0000 |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 0.8195 | 0.0037 | −0.9171 | 0.0002 | 0.8658 | 0.0012 | −0.9143 | 0.0002 | 0.8015 | 0.0053 |
| CRP (μg/mL) | 0.7251 | 0.0177 | −0.7554 | 0.0115 | 0.7447 | 0.0135 | −0.8042 | 0.0050 | 0.6752 | 0.0322 |
| ox-LDL (mmol/L) | 0.8479 | 0.0019 | −0.7459 | 0.0132 | 0.7900 | 0.0065 | −0.7949 | 0.0060 | 0.5266 | 0.1179 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 0.6356 | 0.0483 | −0.5080 | 0.1339 | 0.5734 | 0.0831 | −0.4947 | 0.1460 | 0.5902 | 0.0725 |
Note: NO as dependent variable and SOD, MDA, CRP, ox-LDL, LDL as independent variables, multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that serum SOD and CRP entered the equation, and the equation was y = 0.315 × 1-0.802 × 2-22.120 (y = NO, ×1 = SOD, ×2 = CRP; -22.120 was a constant). ET-1 as dependent variable and SOD, MDA, CRP, ox-LDL, and LDL as independent variables, multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that serum ox-LDL and SOD entered the equation, and the equation was y = 0.051 × 1-0.082 × 2 + 22.517 (y = ET-1, ×1 = ox-LDL, ×2 = SOD; 22.517 was a constant). NO/ET-1 ratio as dependent variable and SOD, MDA, CRP, ox-LDL, LDL as independent variables, multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that serum SOD and CRP entered the equation, and the equation was y = 0.102 × 1-0.316 × 2-13.151 (y = NO/ET-1 ratio, ×1 = SOD, ×2 = CRP; 13.151 was a constant). PCIPA as dependent variable and SOD, MDA, CRP, ox-LDL, LDL as independent variables, multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that serum SOD entered the equation, and the equation was y = 111.437-0.397 × 1 (y = PCIPA, ×1 = SOD; 111.437 was a constant).