Alexandra Suppes1, Joseph J Fins. 1. Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA. acs2008@columbia.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand what influences surrogate decision-makers' expectation that a patient with a disorder of consciousness (DOC; those in a coma, the vegetative state or the minimally conscious state) will recover. SUBJECTS: Forty-one surrogates representing 37 DOC patients completed a survey about their experiences in having a family member with a DOC. METHODS: A quantitative questionnaire assessed surrogate and patient's demographic, medical and psychosocial features that may explain surrogate's expectation of patient recovery. RESULTS: Surrogates who were more relationally enmeshed with the patient thought the patient could communicate better and thought technology would improve treatment of patients with brain injury had greater expectations of recovery. Source of injury and patient's current diagnosis did not explain expectations. CONCLUSION: Relational factors between the patient and the surrogate may explain the surrogate's expectation that the patient will recover more than factors that matter to clinicians such as the source of injury or the patient's diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To understand what influences surrogate decision-makers' expectation that a patient with a disorder of consciousness (DOC; those in a coma, the vegetative state or the minimally conscious state) will recover. SUBJECTS: Forty-one surrogates representing 37 DOC patients completed a survey about their experiences in having a family member with a DOC. METHODS: A quantitative questionnaire assessed surrogate and patient's demographic, medical and psychosocial features that may explain surrogate's expectation of patient recovery. RESULTS: Surrogates who were more relationally enmeshed with the patient thought the patient could communicate better and thought technology would improve treatment of patients with brain injury had greater expectations of recovery. Source of injury and patient's current diagnosis did not explain expectations. CONCLUSION: Relational factors between the patient and the surrogate may explain the surrogate's expectation that the patient will recover more than factors that matter to clinicians such as the source of injury or the patient's diagnosis.
Authors: N D Schiff; J T Giacino; K Kalmar; J D Victor; K Baker; M Gerber; B Fritz; B Eisenberg; T Biondi; J O'Connor; E J Kobylarz; S Farris; A Machado; C McCagg; F Plum; J J Fins; A R Rezai Journal: Nature Date: 2007-08-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Gert J Geurtsen; Caroline M van Heugten; Ron Meijer; Juan D Martina; Alexander C H Geurts Journal: Brain Inj Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Joseph T Giacino; S Ashwal; N Childs; R Cranford; B Jennett; D I Katz; J P Kelly; J H Rosenberg; J Whyte; R D Zafonte; N D Zasler Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-02-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Nikita Leiter; Melissa Motta; Robert M Reed; Temitope Adeyeye; Debra L Wiegand; Nirav G Shah; Avelino C Verceles; Giora Netzer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Kunal Bailoor; Thomas Valley; Chithra Perumalswami; Andrew G Shuman; Raymond DeVries; Darin B Zahuranec Journal: AJOB Empir Bioeth Date: 2018-05-03
Authors: Ellen C Meltzer; Zhenzhen Shi; Alexandra Suppes; Jennifer E Hersh; Jay D Orlander; Aaron W Calhoun; Judy Tung; Lia Logio; Ruth Manna; Philip A Bialer; Cathleen A Acres; Joseph J Fins Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2017-08