Literature DB >> 23895445

Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.

Vitória Piai1, Ardi Roelofs1, Herbert Schriefers1.   

Abstract

Disagreement exists regarding the functional locus of semantic interference of distractor words in picture naming. This effect is a cornerstone of modern psycholinguistic models of word production, which assume that it arises in lexical response-selection. However, recent evidence from studies of dual-task performance suggests a locus in perceptual or conceptual processing, prior to lexical response-selection. In these studies, participants manually responded to a tone and named a picture while ignoring a written distractor word. The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between tone and picture-word stimulus was manipulated. Semantic interference in naming latencies was present at long tone pre-exposure SOAs, but reduced or absent at short SOAs. Under the prevailing structural or strategic response-selection bottleneck and central capacity sharing models of dual-task performance, the underadditivity of the effects of SOA and stimulus type suggests that semantic interference emerges before lexical response-selection. However, in more recent studies, additive effects of SOA and stimulus type were obtained. Here, we examined the discrepancy in results between these studies in 6 experiments in which we systematically manipulated various dimensions on which these earlier studies differed, including tasks, materials, stimulus types, and SOAs. In all our experiments, additive effects of SOA and stimulus type on naming latencies were obtained. These results strongly suggest that the semantic interference effect arises after perceptual and conceptual processing, during lexical response-selection or later. We discuss several theoretical alternatives with respect to their potential to account for the discrepancy between the present results and other studies showing underadditivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23895445     DOI: 10.1037/a0033745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

1.  Inhibitory Control of Lexical Selection in Adults who Stutter.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.538

2.  The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Bo Youn Park; Sujin Kim; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Semantic interference in the picture-word interference task: Is there a pre-lexical, conceptual contribution to the effect?

Authors:  Jörg D Jescheniak; Stefan Wöhner; Hanna S Bethcke; Marie C Beaupain
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

4.  Localizing semantic interference from distractor sounds in picture naming: A dual-task study.

Authors:  Andreas Mädebach; Marie-Luise Kieseler; Jörg D Jescheniak
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

5.  Resolving semantic interference during word production requires central attention.

Authors:  Daniel Kleinman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Cognitive control of action naming in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.538

Review 7.  Picture-word interference is a Stroop effect: A theoretical analysis and new empirical findings.

Authors:  Peter A Starreveld; Wido La Heij
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

8.  Using Brain Potentials to Functionally Localise Stroop-Like Effects in Colour and Picture Naming: Perceptual Encoding versus Word Planning.

Authors:  Natalia Shitova; Ardi Roelofs; Herbert Schriefers; Marcel Bastiaansen; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Is Immediate Processing of Presupposition Triggers Automatic or Capacity-Limited? A Combination of the PRP Approach with a Self-Paced Reading Task.

Authors:  Cosima Schneider; Nadine Bade; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-04

10.  Age-related differences in the neural bases of phonological and semantic processes in the context of task-irrelevant information.

Authors:  Michele T Diaz; Micah A Johnson; Deborah M Burke; Trong-Kha Truong; David J Madden
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.