Literature DB >> 23895319

Examining the impact of feedback and repeated readings on oral reading fluency: let's not forget prosody.

Scott P Ardoin1, Laura S Morena1, Katherine S Binder2, Tori E Foster1.   

Abstract

Although extensive research supports repeated readings (RR) as an intervention for improving reading fluency, it largely ignores reading prosody, which is a key component of reading fluency. The current study extends the RR literature by examining the impact of RR on prosody and whether the content of directions and feedback might impact what components of fluency are improved. Elementary students (N = 76) were randomly assigned to either a rate- or prosody-focused RR intervention. The study differs from existing RR research in that (a) students were average as opposed to struggling students, (b) prosody was evaluated, and (c) measures of prosody were objective as opposed to subjective. Results support previous research suggesting that RR improves fluency but indicate that the nature of the instruction and performance feedback provided to students influences the components of reading fluency (i.e., rate or prosody) that are improved. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23895319     DOI: 10.1037/spq0000027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sch Psychol Q        ISSN: 1045-3830


  1 in total

1.  Is reading prosody related to reading comprehension? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alissa Wolters; Young-Suk Grace Kim; John William Szura
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2020-12-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.