Literature DB >> 23895304

Clinical and biochemical improvement following low-dose intravenous iron therapy in a patient with erythropoietic protoporphyria.

Douglas P Bentley1, Elizabeth M Meek.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erythropoietic Protoporphyria; depletion of intracellular free erythrocyte protoporphyrin; low-dose intravenous iron therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23895304      PMCID: PMC4153882          DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


× No keyword cloud information.
Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) affects porphyrin and iron metabolism and is most often due to dominant inheritance of a mutation in the ferrochelatase gene (FECH, EC 4.99.1.1) with penetrance dependant on the co-inheritance of a single nucleotide polymorphism, IVS3-48C, which reduces expression from the remaining wild-type gene (Gouya et al, 2002). This leads to inadequate iron insertion into protoporphyrin lX (PPIX), which can be metabolized only after its conversion to haem. Impaired ferrochelatase activity therefore causes PPIX accumulation at the sites of blocked haem synthesis. The exposure of PPIX to solar radiation generates reactive oxygen species and, by largely indiscriminate macromolecular damage, causes severe cutaneous reactions. EPP patients also have a subnormal iron status (Holme et al, 2007a; Delaby et al, 2009). A 23-year-old Caucasian male, heterozygous both for a T→C substitution at nucleotide 557 of FECH and the IVS3-48C allelic variant, suffered life-long photosensitivity which had previously responded to oral iron therapy (Holme et al, 2007b). He consented to intravenous (IV) iron therapy offered because of incapacitating gastrointestinal symptoms. Immediately prior to treatment (Fig 1, week 1) his free erythrocyte protoporphyrin concentration (FEP) was 32·1 μmol/l; during the previous 2 years this had fluctuated between 30 and 40 μmol/l, unrelated to the intermittent oral iron therapy. Serum ferritin concentration (SFn) was 63·8 μg/l and had not previously exceeded 50 μg/l. His serum erythropoietin concentration was normal at 10·7 mu/ml. Haemoglobin concentration (Hb) was typical at 126 g/l and remained without significant change throughout the study.
Fig. 1

Change in free erythrocyte protoporphyrin (FEP) and serum ferritin concentration after treatment with intravenous iron. Iron doses were either 100 mg (dark arrows) or 200 mg (lighter arrows).

Change in free erythrocyte protoporphyrin (FEP) and serum ferritin concentration after treatment with intravenous iron. Iron doses were either 100 mg (dark arrows) or 200 mg (lighter arrows). A proprietary iron hydroxide sucrose preparation (Venofer®; Synermed, (Pharmaceutical Products Ltd) Purley Surry, UK) was administered intravenously to augment iron stores in smaller doses and given at greater intervals than required by anaemic patients. A SFn target was set at 100–200 μg/l to provide adequate iron reserves without the risk of iron overload. An initial course of 400 mg of IV iron (100 mg on each occasion) given over 5 weeks increased the SFn predictably (Walters et al, 1973) to 113 μg/l (Fig 1) but this fell to 26 μg/l after 8 months without treatment. The possibility of urinary iron loss was noted in the product literature and on only the first day after an iron infusion, mild haemosiderinuria was detected and an iron loss of 8·5 mg/24 h determined. There was no overt evidence of significant intravascular haemolysis (falling Hb, red cell fragmentation, reticulocytosis, hyperbilirubinaemia or fall in serum haptoglobin concentration). Except immediately after an iron infusion his serum iron concentration varied between 10·2 and 33·1 μmol/l (reference range 8–32 μmol/l), as was found prior to treatment and unrelated to any other parameter. A striking improvement in his general health (Table 1) was evident within the first 2 months of treatment. His tolerance to solar radiation increased, he became asymptomatic and developed a suntan without discomfort. There was a visible and sustained increase in musculature. There had been no exposure to anabolic steroids. No adverse effects were experienced.
Table 1

Symptoms recorded by the patient before regular iron therapy was taken, after oral iron and after intravenous iron

SymptomsBefore iron givenAfter oral iron therapyAfter intravenous iron therapy
Solar sensitivityRapid burningSome burningImproved
UlcerationImprovedAbsent
ScarringImprovedAbsent
OedemaImprovedAbsent
Up to 3 d in bedImprovedNo need for bed rest
Wind sensitivityExposed areas painfulNo changeImproved
Hands feel coldNo changeNo change
Sweating palmsNo changeImproved
TachycardiaNo changeAbsent
OedemaImprovedAbsent
Nail changesDiscolourationImprovedNormal
BrittleBrittleImproved
Lateral ridgesImprovedNormal
LiftingImprovedNormal
Cutaneous abnormalitiesPale; never tansImprovedNow tans without discomfort
TranslucencySubstantial improvementNow normal
Fragile; easy bruisingImprovedImproved
Tactile epidermolysisImprovedAbsent
Scarring on exposed areasNo changeAbsent
Other symptomsFatigueSubstantial improvementNow normal
StaminaSubstantial improvementImproved but still suboptimal
Poor mental concentrationSubstantial improvementNow normal
Poor musculatureImprovedSubstantial improvement
Body fat10%6%
Symptoms recorded by the patient before regular iron therapy was taken, after oral iron and after intravenous iron Unexpectedly, the FEP fell immediately during the first course of treatment (Fig 1) and closely followed a linear time-dependence (r2 = 0·96), indicating stable, intracellular retention of PPIX and a non-random age-dependent loss of PP1X-containing red cells. As the red cell lifespan cannot be prolonged and there is no haem synthesis in post-reticulocyte stage red cells, the slope (−0·08 μmol/d) of the decay is the net effect of the decreasing number of residual PPIX-rich red cells and their replacement by new red cells with lower, but still significant, PPIX concentrations. This was confirmed by fluorescent flow cytometry of a random whole blood sample, taken between courses of treatment, which indicated the presence of two discrete red cell populations with different, but elevated PPIX (data not shown). From these data the maximum red cell lifespan of 120 d would imply that a minimum FEP of 22 μmol/l could be achieved in this patient with this schedule of iron treatment. At 90 d from the beginning of treatment the FEP became stable but resumed a linear (−0·03 μmol/d; r2 = 0·852) decay after iron therapy was reintroduced. These findings confirm the link between the iron therapy and the fall in FEP. A median FEP of 21·4 μmol/l has been maintained for over 5 years with intermittent doses of 200 mg of iron up to three times yearly with neither symptoms of EPP appearing nor evidence of iron overload (SFn 150–240 μg/l). Liver function has remained normal throughout. Only small, controlled doses of iron are required to give this patient a significantly improved quality of life. Enhanced iron stores, haemoglobin, myoglobin and a significant urinary loss account for all the iron administered. The iron deficit in EPP patients has been attributed to defective iron absorption (Holme et al, 2007a). This is supported by the findings in the current patient in whom the overall iron administered indicated a requirement of 1·5–2 mg daily i.e. approximating to that needed to compensate for the insensible iron loss and for the augmentation of iron stores in an adult male. The evidence for the value of iron therapy in EPP is contradictory, with a report of benefit in one patient (Gordeuk et al, 1968) whilst others reported an unexplained exacerbation of symptoms developing up to several weeks after the beginning of treatment (Milligan et al, 1988). There is anecdotal evidence of benefit from hypertransfusion of red cells and haematin infusions, both of which would increase iron availability, but no definitive evidence of these inducing a symptomatic relapse. In vitro studies have shown (Crooks et al, 2010) that iron availability determines the stability of early ferrochelatase and we suggest that this mechanism may decrease FEP and alleviate symptoms in EPP. The effect of iron status on the expression of genes relevant in EPP merits exploration. For EPP patients considered for iron therapy on the basis of intractable symptoms or evidence of low iron status (Holme et al, 2007a), it is suggested that small doses of intravenous iron may be administered safely and an early fall in FEP used as an indicator of response. Doses of 1 mg iron/kg IV intermittently to patients with a SFn <100 μg/l are likely to be effective and it is unnecessary to achieve an FEP <25 μmol/l to obtain a symptomless remission.
  8 in total

1.  Symptomatic response of erythropoietic protoporphyria to iron supplementation.

Authors:  S Alexander Holme; Charles L Thomas; Sharon D Whatley; Douglas P Bentley; Alexander V Anstey; Michael N Badminton
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  The penetrance of dominant erythropoietic protoporphyria is modulated by expression of wildtype FECH.

Authors:  Laurent Gouya; Herve Puy; Anne-Marie Robreau; Monique Bourgeois; Jerôme Lamoril; Vasco Da Silva; Bernard Grandchamp; Jean-Charles Deybach
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12-20       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Erythropoietic protoporphyria exacerbated by oral iron therapy.

Authors:  A Milligan; R A Graham-Brown; I Sarkany; H Baker
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  Serum ferritin concentration and iron stores in normal subjects.

Authors:  G O Walters; F M Miller; M Worwood
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Posttranslational stability of the heme biosynthetic enzyme ferrochelatase is dependent on iron availability and intact iron-sulfur cluster assembly machinery.

Authors:  Daniel R Crooks; Manik C Ghosh; Ronald G Haller; Wing-Hang Tong; Tracey A Rouault
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Erythropoiesis and iron metabolism in dominant erythropoietic protoporphyria.

Authors:  S Alexander Holme; Mark Worwood; Alexander V Anstey; George H Elder; Michael N Badminton
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Excessive erythrocyte PPIX influences the hematologic status and iron metabolism in patients with dominant erythropoietic protoporphyria.

Authors:  C Delaby; S Lyoumi; S Ducamp; C Martin-Schmitt; L Gouya; J C Deybach; C Beaumont; H Puy
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 1.770

8.  Iron therapy for hepatic dysfunction in erythropoietic protoporphyria.

Authors:  V R Gordeuk; G M Brittenham; C W Hawkins; H Mukhtar; D R Bickers
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 25.391

  8 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Erythropoietic Protoporphyria and X-Linked Protoporphyria: pathophysiology, genetics, clinical manifestations, and management.

Authors:  Manisha Balwani
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.797

Review 2.  Clinically important features of porphyrin and heme metabolism and the porphyrias.

Authors:  Siddesh Besur; Wehong Hou; Paul Schmeltzer; Herbert L Bonkovsky
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2014-11-03

Review 3.  Advances in the management of erythropoietic protoporphyria - role of afamelanotide.

Authors:  Ashley M Lane; Jerome T McKay; Herbert L Bonkovsky
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2016-12-12

Review 4.  Iron in Porphyrias: Friend or Foe?

Authors:  Elena Buzzetti; Paolo Ventura; Elena Corradini
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 5.  Biology of Heme in Mammalian Erythroid Cells and Related Disorders.

Authors:  Tohru Fujiwara; Hideo Harigae
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Iron, Heme Synthesis and Erythropoietic Porphyrias: A Complex Interplay.

Authors:  Antoine Poli; Caroline Schmitt; Boualem Moulouel; Arienne Mirmiran; Hervé Puy; Thibaud Lefèbvre; Laurent Gouya
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-11-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.