Silje M Ormhaug1, Tine K Jensen2, Tore Wentzel-Larsen1, Stephen R Shirk3. 1. Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies. 2. Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies and Department of Psychology, University of Oslo. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Denver.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We examined the contribution of alliance to the outcome of therapy with traumatized youths across two different treatment conditions (trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy [TF-CBT] and therapy as usual [TAU]). METHOD: Participants were 156 youths (M age = 15.1 years, range = 10-18; 79.5% girls), randomly assigned to TF-CBT or TAU. Symptoms were assessed pretreatment, midtreatment (Session 6), and posttreatment (Session 15). Alliance was assessed after Sessions 1 and 6, using the Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Children-Revised (TASC-R). RESULTS:Alliance scores were comparable across treatment conditions, but TF-CBT participants had significantly lower posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) posttreatment (d = 0.51). Hierarchical regression analyses showed that there were no significant alliance effects in models without an Alliance × Treatment Group interaction: Alliance ratings were significant predictors of reduction in PTSS (Est. = -0.53, p = .003, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.87 to -0.18) and additional outcomes measured in TF-CBT but not in TAU (PTSS posttreatment: Est. = 0.01, p = .647, 95% CI = -0.29 to 0.47). CONCLUSION: This study was the first to investigate the contribution of alliance to outcome among adolescents with posttraumatic symptoms, treated withTF-CBT or TAU. Our findings indicated that there was an important interaction between alliance and therapeutic approach, as alliance predicted outcome in TF-CBT, but not in the nonspecific treatment condition. A positive working relationship appeared to be especially important in the context of this evidence-based treatment, which requires youth involvement in specific therapy tasks. Further, findings showed that use of a manual did not compromise alliance formation. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We examined the contribution of alliance to the outcome of therapy with traumatized youths across two different treatment conditions (trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy [TF-CBT] and therapy as usual [TAU]). METHOD:Participants were 156 youths (M age = 15.1 years, range = 10-18; 79.5% girls), randomly assigned to TF-CBT or TAU. Symptoms were assessed pretreatment, midtreatment (Session 6), and posttreatment (Session 15). Alliance was assessed after Sessions 1 and 6, using the Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Children-Revised (TASC-R). RESULTS: Alliance scores were comparable across treatment conditions, but TF-CBT participants had significantly lower posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) posttreatment (d = 0.51). Hierarchical regression analyses showed that there were no significant alliance effects in models without an Alliance × Treatment Group interaction: Alliance ratings were significant predictors of reduction in PTSS (Est. = -0.53, p = .003, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.87 to -0.18) and additional outcomes measured in TF-CBT but not in TAU (PTSS posttreatment: Est. = 0.01, p = .647, 95% CI = -0.29 to 0.47). CONCLUSION: This study was the first to investigate the contribution of alliance to outcome among adolescents with posttraumatic symptoms, treated with TF-CBT or TAU. Our findings indicated that there was an important interaction between alliance and therapeutic approach, as alliance predicted outcome in TF-CBT, but not in the nonspecific treatment condition. A positive working relationship appeared to be especially important in the context of this evidence-based treatment, which requires youth involvement in specific therapy tasks. Further, findings showed that use of a manual did not compromise alliance formation. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.
Authors: Jessica A Chen; John C Fortney; Hannah E Bergman; Kendall C Browne; Kathleen M Grubbs; Teresa J Hudson; Patrick J Raue Journal: Psychol Serv Date: 2019-02-11
Authors: Jennifer H Lewey; Christopher L Smith; Brandi Burcham; Nia L Saunders; Dina Elfallal; Siobhan K O'Toole Journal: J Child Adolesc Trauma Date: 2018-06-11
Authors: Saskia Bj Koch; Mirjam van Zuiden; Laura Nawijn; Jessie L Frijling; Dick J Veltman; Miranda Olff Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Bryce D McLeod; Amanda Jensen-Doss; Carrie B Tully; Michael A Southam-Gerow; John R Weisz; Philip C Kendall Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2016-02-15