Literature DB >> 23894712

The role of FOXP3 in disease progression in colorectal cancer patients.

Tanja Grimmig1, Mia Kim, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Martin Gasser, Ana Maria Waaga-Gasser.   

Abstract

The transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) has been identified as a marker of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells and is a key determinant of their immunosuppressive functions. FOXP3 has indeed been shown to limit antitumor immune responses during tumor progression. In addition, by expressing FOXP3, tumor cells may evade effector T-cell responses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FOXP3; colorectal cancer; prognosis

Year:  2013        PMID: 23894712      PMCID: PMC3716747          DOI: 10.4161/onci.24521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Strategies to Evade Effective Antitumor Responses

Tumor progression results from a disrupted regulation of cell growth as well as from the failure of the host to mount an efficient antitumor immune response. Most human colorectal cancer (CRC) patients do not develop satisfactory antitumor immune responses, pointing to the existence of strategies whereby CRCs evade immune effectors. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been shown to be critical for the maintenance of immunologic tolerance. Moreover, the transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) has been identified not only as a key player in the immunosuppressive functions of Tregs but also as a definitive marker of CD4+CD25+ Tregs. Some subclasses of Tregs exert immunosuppressive functions by producing cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ). In vivo, Tregs have been shown to specifically block cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) functions through TGFβ signaling, standing out as a crucial facet of the complex role of TGFβ in cancer biology. Tregs can also suppress the activation and/or proliferation of T cells without producing cytokines, via a mechanism that requires cell-to-cell contacts. FOXP3 confers Tregs with an immunosuppressive phenotype by enhancing their metabolic status and by improving cell survival. FOXP3 is able to repress the expression of specific cytokines by interacting with phosphodiesterase 3B, cGMP-inhibited (PDE3B) and the transcription factor NF-κB, a key driver of inflammation. In vitro, naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ Tregs as well as FOXP3-transduced CD4+ T cells inhibit the proliferation of naive T cells. In vivo, a high density of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3+ Tregs has been associated with poor disease outcome in patients affected by various solid tumors, including pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. Taken together, these observations plead in favor of a substantial role of Tregs in oncogenesis and tumor progression, which may be related to their robust immunosuppressive functions. Another effective strategy for malignant cells to evade antitumor responses consists in the direct secretion of immunosuppressive factors such as IL-10 and TGFβ, a process that may be related to FOXP3 expression by cancer cells. Whether the expression of these cytokines truly provides tumors with the ability to evade immune responses remains to be elucidated. In vitro, FOXP3 expression by tumor cells has been correlated with the inhibition of T-cell proliferation, indicating that cancer cells may share growth-suppressive effects with Tregs and that mimicking Tregs functions may represent a novel mechanism of immune evasion.

Correlation between FOXP3 Expression and Tumor Progression

In various solid tumors, including ovarian and pancreatic cancer, a high density of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3+ Tregs has been linked with poor disease outcome. Conversely, no significant association between the absolute number of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3+ T cells and prognosis was established in several studies involving CRC patients. In addition, some studies suggest that a high frequency of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3+ Tregs may de facto be associated with a favorable, rather than a dismal, prognosis. Recent clinical data have provided the first evidence in support of FOXP3 expression by multiple distinct cancer cells. However, the biological significance of FOXP3 expression by CRC cells remains unknown. We have recently evaluated FOXP3 expression by tumor-infiltrating Tregs and CRC cells in patients affected by different stages of the disease (UICC I–IV) and investigated its long-term prognostic significance. The analysis of CD4, CD25, FOXP3, IL-10 and TGFβ expression profiles suggest that CD4 and CD25 are expressed to significantly higher levels in early (UICC I/II) lesions than in advanced (UICC III/IV) tumors, while FOXP3, IL-10 and TGFβ appeared to be significantly downregulated in early, as opposed to advanced, neoplasms. Additional analyses demonstrated an increased amount of CD4+, CD25+, FOXP3+, IL-10+ and TGFβ+ expressing cells in early tumors as compared with advanced lesions as well as non-malignant tissues. FOXP3+ cancer cells were detected in 60 out of 65 CRC patients analyzed in this respect. We have observed that the expression of FOXP3 by cancer cells was significantly correlated with that of IL-10 and TGFβ. We demonstrated for the first time a significantly increased expression of FOXP3 by CRC cells. Additionally, we provided evidence for an association between increased FOXP3 expression levels by cancer cells and poor prognosis. By expressing FOXP3, malignant cells would be capable to downregulate antitumor effector T-cell responses. The overall survival of patients exhibiting low or high levels of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3+ Tregs in comparison to that of patients displaying low or high FOXP3 levels on malignant cells suggested that FOXP3 expression by cancer cells may constitute a prognostic factor. Indeed, CRC patients exhibiting high FOXP3 expression levels on cancer cells had a worse prognosis than patients with low FOXP3 levels. Conversely, no significant correlation was observed between the expression pattern of FOXP3 on tumor-infiltrating Tregs and prognosis. In conclusion, the expression of FOXP3 by cancer cells, resulting in the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines such as IL-10 and TGFβ into the tumor microenvironment, may allow them to evade effector T-cell responses and hence progress (Fig. 1). In addition, FOXP3 expression by cancer cells appears as an independent prognostic factor for CRC patients.

Figure 1. Impact of FOXP3 on oncogenesis and tumor progression. Immunosuppressive cytokines such as interleukin-10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) released by either FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) or FOXP3+ cancer cells inhibit the activation of naive T cells, hence limiting antitumor immune responses and favoring oncogenesis and tumor progression.

Figure 1. Impact of FOXP3 on oncogenesis and tumor progression. Immunosuppressive cytokines such as interleukin-10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) released by either FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) or FOXP3+ cancer cells inhibit the activation of naive T cells, hence limiting antitumor immune responses and favoring oncogenesis and tumor progression.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Regulatory T cells: key controllers of immunologic self-tolerance.

Authors:  S Sakaguchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-05-26       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3.

Authors:  Shohei Hori; Takashi Nomura; Shimon Sakaguchi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Foxp3 interacts with nuclear factor of activated T cells and NF-kappa B to repress cytokine gene expression and effector functions of T helper cells.

Authors:  Estelle Bettelli; Maryam Dastrange; Mohamed Oukka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Immune evasion by tumours: involvement of the CD95 (APO-1/Fas) system and its clinical implications.

Authors:  S Strand; P R Galle
Journal:  Mol Med Today       Date:  1998-02

5.  Prevalence of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells increases during the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its premalignant lesions.

Authors:  Nobuyoshi Hiraoka; Kaoru Onozato; Tomoo Kosuge; Setsuo Hirohashi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Intratumoral balance of regulatory and cytotoxic T cells is associated with prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection.

Authors:  Qiang Gao; Shuang-Jian Qiu; Jia Fan; Jian Zhou; Xiao-Ying Wang; Yong-Sheng Xiao; Yang Xu; Yi-Wei Li; Zhao-You Tang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Foxp3 expression in pancreatic carcinoma cells as a novel mechanism of immune evasion in cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian Hinz; Laia Pagerols-Raluy; Hans-Heinrich Oberg; Ole Ammerpohl; Sandra Grüssel; Bence Sipos; Robert Grützmann; Christian Pilarsky; Hendrik Ungefroren; Hans-Detlev Saeger; Günter Klöppel; Dieter Kabelitz; Holger Kalthoff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Tumor-infiltrating FOXP3+ T regulatory cells show strong prognostic significance in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Paul Salama; Michael Phillips; Fabienne Grieu; Melinda Morris; Nik Zeps; David Joseph; Cameron Platell; Barry Iacopetta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Expression of Foxp3 in colorectal cancer but not in Treg cells correlates with disease progression in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mia Kim; Tanja Grimmig; Martin Grimm; Maria Lazariotou; Eva Meier; Andreas Rosenwald; Igor Tsaur; Roman Blaheta; Uwe Heemann; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Ana Maria Waaga-Gasser; Martin Gasser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Foxp3 expression in human cancer cells.

Authors:  Vaios Karanikas; Matthaios Speletas; Maria Zamanakou; Fani Kalala; Gedeon Loules; Theodora Kerenidi; Angeliki K Barda; Konstantinos I Gourgoulianis; Anastasios E Germenis
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 5.531

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Foxp3 is a key downstream regulator of p53-mediated cellular senescence.

Authors:  J-E Kim; J-S Shin; J-H Moon; S-W Hong; D-J Jung; J H Kim; I-Y Hwang; Y J Shin; E-Y Gong; D H Lee; S-M Kim; E Y Lee; Y S Kim; D Kim; D Hur; T W Kim; K-P Kim; D-H Jin; W-J Lee
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Foxp3 expression in CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells promotes development of colorectal cancer by inhibiting tumor immunity.

Authors:  Xiao-Wen Zhu; Hai-Zhen Zhu; You-Qing Zhu; Mao-Hui Feng; Jian Qi; Zhi-Fen Chen
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-18

3.  Endothelin B receptor expression in malignant gliomas: the perivascular immune escape mechanism of gliomas.

Authors:  Shinji Nakashima; Yasuo Sugita; Hiroaki Miyoshi; Fumiko Arakawa; Hiroko Muta; Yukinao Ishibashi; Daisuke Niino; Koichi Ohshima; Mizuhiko Terasaki; Yukihiko Nakamura; Motohiro Morioka
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Trial Watch: Peptide-based anticancer vaccines.

Authors:  Jonathan Pol; Norma Bloy; Aitziber Buqué; Alexander Eggermont; Isabelle Cremer; Catherine Sautès-Fridman; Jérôme Galon; Eric Tartour; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 5.  The Application of Gene Expression Profiling in Predictions of Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Noshad Peyravian; Pegah Larki; Ehsan Gharib; Ehsan Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad; Fakhrosadate Anaraki; Chris Young; James McClellan; Maziar Ashrafian Bonab; Hamid Asadzadeh-Aghdaei; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2018-03-02

6.  Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Regulatory T Cells Infiltration and the Clinical Outcome in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Dariusz Waniczek; Zbigniew Lorenc; Mirosław Śnietura; Mariusz Wesecki; Agnieszka Kopec; Małgorzata Muc-Wierzgoń
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 7.  Molecular networks of FOXP family: dual biologic functions, interplay with other molecules and clinical implications in cancer progression.

Authors:  Ju-Ha Kim; Jisung Hwang; Ji Hoon Jung; Hyo-Jung Lee; Dae Young Lee; Sung-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 27.401

8.  Peritoneal Modulators of Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Brunty; Lauren Clower; Brenda Mitchell; Taylor Fleshman; Nadim Bou Zgheib; Nalini Santanam
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Cancer-Associated Immune Resistance and Evasion of Immune Surveillance in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Parcesepe; Guido Giordano; Carmelo Laudanna; Antonio Febbraro; Massimo Pancione
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.260

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.