| Literature DB >> 23894360 |
Hava Lofton1, Maria Pränting, Elisabeth Thulin, Dan I Andersson.
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a potential new class of antimicrobial drugs with potent and broad-spectrum activities. However, knowledge about the mechanisms and rates of resistance development to AMPs and the resulting effects on fitness and cross-resistance is limited. We isolated antimicrobial peptide (AMP) resistant Salmonella typhimurium LT2 mutants by serially passaging several independent bacterial lineages in progressively increasing concentrations of LL-37, CNY100HL and Wheat Germ Histones. Significant AMP resistance developed in 15/18 independent bacterial lineages. Resistance mutations were identified by whole genome sequencing in two-component signal transduction systems (pmrB and phoP) as well as in the LPS core biosynthesis pathway (waaY, also designated rfaY). In most cases, resistance was associated with a reduced fitness, observed as a decreased growth rate, which was dependent on growth conditions and mutation type. Importantly, mutations in waaY decreased bacterial susceptibility to all tested AMPs and the mutant outcompeted the wild type parental strain at AMP concentrations below the MIC for the wild type. Our data suggests that resistance to antimicrobial peptides can develop rapidly through mechanisms that confer cross-resistance to several AMPs. Importantly, AMP-resistant mutants can have a competitive advantage over the wild type strain at AMP concentrations similar to those found near human epithelial cells. These results suggest that resistant mutants could both be selected de novo and maintained by exposure to our own natural repertoire of defence molecules.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23894360 PMCID: PMC3720879 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Strains and plasmids used in this study.
| Strain | Genotype | Origin and description |
| DA6079 |
| Lab collection |
| DA6192 |
| Lab collection, wild type |
| DA15110 |
| 22 |
| DA15111 |
| 22 |
| DA16874 |
| This work, original LL-37 resistant isolate 1, mutator |
| DA16875 |
| This work, original CNY100HL resistant isolate 1 |
| DA17610 |
| This work, original CNY100HL resistant isolate 1 |
| DA17847 |
| This work, original LL-37 resistant isolate 2 |
| DA22427 |
| This work, reconstituted single |
| DA22431 |
| This work, reconstituted control |
| DA23040 |
| This work, reconstituted single |
| DA23042 | 4597041::Kan | This work, reconstituted control |
| DA23175 |
| This work, reconstituted single |
| DA23177 |
| This work, reconstituted control |
| DA23179 |
| This work, reconstituted double |
| DA23299 |
| This work, reconstituted control |
| DA23301 |
| This work, reconstituted double |
| DA23305 |
| This work, reconstituted control |
| DA23307 |
| This work, reconstituted single |
| DA23309 | 1327454(scar) | This work, reconstituted control |
| DA23899 |
| This work, reconstituted triple |
| DA23902 |
| This work, reconstituted control |
| DA24144 |
| This work, reconstituted control |
| DA24301 |
| This work, reconstituted double |
| DA23410 |
| This work, for competition assay |
| DA23414 |
| This work, for competition assay |
| DA23418 |
| This work, for competition assay |
| DA23423 |
| This work, for competition assay |
| DA23426 | 1327454(scar), | This work, for competition assay |
| DA24148 |
| This work, for competition assay |
| DA24152 |
| This work, for competition assay |
| DA24156 |
| This work, for competition assay |
| DA24161 |
| This work, for competition assay |
| DA24164 |
| This work, for competition assay |
| DA24577 |
| This work, for competition assay |
| DA24583 |
| This work, for competition assay |
| DA24593 |
| This work, for competition assay |
| DA24603 |
| This work, for competition assay |
|
| ||
| pSIM5-Tet | Temperature-controlled λ-red system | Lab Collection |
All strains are derived from S. typhimurium LT2.
Exact position of scar sequences can be found in Table S2.
Only selected mutations confirmed by PCR shown here. For a full list of mutations, see Tables S3, S4, S5, and S6.
FS, frame shift; del, deletion.
AMP concentrations and AMP MICs for the different bacterial lineages before and after experimental evolution in refined LB.
| Lineage | Start AMP-conc. (mg/L) | End AMP-conc. (mg/L) | No. of generations | MIC after cycling (mg/L) |
| LL-37 1 | 12.5 | 63.3 | 511 | 75 |
| LL-37 2 | 12.5 | 63.3 | 511 | 75– >75 |
| LL-37 3 | 12.5 | 42.2 | 490 | ND |
| LL-37 4 | 12.5 | 42.2 | 504 | ND |
| LL-37 5 | 12.5 | 63.3 | 553 | 75–>75 |
| LL-37 6 | 12.5 | 63.3 | 518 | 75 |
| CNY100HL 1 | 10 | 33.8 | 476 | 10 |
| CNY100HL 2 | 10 | 22.5 | 462 | ND |
| CNY100HL 3 | 10 | 33.8 | 532 | 10–20 |
| CNY100HL 4 | 10 | 33.8 | 469 | 10–30 |
| CNY100HL 5 | 10 | 22.5 | 413 | ND |
| CNY100HL 6 | 10 | 22.5 | 441 | ND |
| WGH 1 | 20 | 200 | 567 | >300 |
| WGH 2 | 20 | 200 | 560 | >300 |
| WGH 3 | 20 | 200 | 553 | >300 |
| WGH 4 | 20 | 200 | 560 | >300 |
| WGH 5 | 20 | 200 | 553 | >300 |
| WGH 6 | 20 | 200 | 560 | >300 |
Peptide-MIC for positive control lineages after cycling (bacteria cycled without peptide): LL-37, PC 2 = 25–50 mg/L, PC 4 = 50 mg/L; CNY100HL, PC 6 = 5–10 mg/L; WGH, PC 2 = 6.25–12.5 mg/L, PC 7 = 12.5 mg/L.
ND, not determined.
MIC determinations were performed on a population of cells (compare Table 4).
Cross-resistance to AMPs WGHs, LL-37 and CNY100HL as determined by microdilution MIC assays in NaPB.
| Strains | MIC (mg/mL) | ||
| WGH | LL-37 | CNY100HL | |
| DA6192 ( | 6.25 | 6.25 | 2.5 |
| DA16875 (WGH resistant isolate 1) | 25 | 6.25 | 2.5–5 |
| DA17847 (LL-37 resistant isolate 2) | 12.5–25 | 6.25 | ND |
| DA16874 (LL-37 resistant isolate 1) | 25 | 12.5–50 | 2.5–5 |
| DA17610 (CNY100HL resistant isolate 1) | 6.25–12.5 | 6.25–12.5 | 5 |
| DA22427 ( | 12.5 | 6.25 | 2.5 |
| DA23175 ( | 6.25–12.5 | 6.25 | 2.5 |
| DA23307 ( | 6.25–12.5 | 6.25–12.5 | 5 |
| DA23899 ( | 12.5–25 | 6.25 | 5 |
ND, not determined.
MIC determinations were performed on isolated clones obtained from the serially passaged populations (compare Table 2).
Figure 1Susceptibility of the original mutants to the AMPs used in the original selection experiment.
The curves represent the change in number of viable cells (log scale) over time at different concentrations of AMPs in NaPB. (A) WGH resistant isolate 1 (DA16875)+WGH; (B) CNY100HL resistant isolate 1 (DA17610)+CNY100HL; (C) LL-37 resistant isolate 1 (DA16874)+LL-37; (D) LL-37 resistant isolate 2 (DA17847)+LL-37. Open symbols, parental wild type strain (DA6079); filled symbols, original cycled resistant strains. The error bars represent the SEM (±).
Figure 2Susceptibility of reconstituted mutant strains to WGH, LL-37 and CNY100HL.
The curves represent the change in number of viable cells (log scale) over time at different concentrations of AMP in NaPB. Left panel, waaY (FS) mutant DA22427; middle panel, phoP (D23N) mutant DA23307; right panel, waaY, phoP, pmrB (R13H) triple mutant DA23899 treated with from top to bottom: WGHs, LL-37 and CNY100HL. The susceptible wild type strain (DA6192) is included in all graphs. Dashed lines represent wild type and solid lines reconstituted mutants. The data is the average of at least 2 separate experiments ±SEM.
Figure 3Survival of the reconstituted mutant strains.
Cell viability for reconstituted strains (DA22427, DA23175, DA23307 and DA23899) and susceptible parental wild type strain (DA6192) at (A) 2 hours and (B) 4 hours of AMP-treatment. Black bars, untreated controls; dark gray bars, WGH treatment (10 mg/L); striped bars, CNY100HL treatment (5 mg/L); and light gray bars, LL-37 treatment (10 mg/L). The data ± SEM is derived from the time-kill assays in Figure 2.
Fitness of original and reconstituted mutants relative to wild type controls as determined by growth rate assays and competition experiments.
| Strain | Fitness change relative to wild type | |||
| Growth rate assay | Competition assay | |||
| Refined LB | MH | NaPB | NaPB | |
| Wild type controls | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DA16875 (WGH resistant isolate 1) | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.88 | ND |
| DA16874 (LL-37 resistant isolate 1) | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.91 | ND |
| DA17847 (LL-37 resistant isolate 2) | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.90 | ND |
| DA17610 (CNY100HL resistant isolate 1) | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.73 | ND |
| DA22427 ( | ND | 0.96 | 1.05 | 0.99 |
| DA23175 ( | ND | 0.99 | 1.04 | 1.01 |
| DA23307 ( | ND | 0.93 | 0.84 | 0.84 |
| DA23899 ( | ND | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.84 |
DA6079 was used as wild type control for the original mutants and the respective congenic strains were used as controls for reconstituted mutants.
ND, not determined.
Maximum standard error of the mean (SEM): Refined LB (SEM ±0.02), MH (SEM ±0.03) and NaPB (SEM ±0.05).
Figure 4Competition experiments for the waaY (FS) mutant.
Competitions between the reconstituted waaY frameshift mutant DA22427 (cfp tagged) and its congenic, susceptible counterpart DA22431 (yfp tagged). These experiments were performed at different concentrations of the three different peptides in this study, (A) WGHs (orange), (B) LL-37 (purple) and (C) CNY100HL (green). The curves represent the ratio of resistant (waaY mutant) to susceptible strain at different generations of growth. The data is the result of at least 2 separate competitions performed in duplicate for each peptide. (D) The selection coefficient ± SEM was deduced from the slopes in (A)-(C) and is plotted as a function of peptide concentration.
Cross-resistance against different antibiotics as determined by Etests.
| Strains | Antibiotic | ||||||
| CR | FEP | MEM | CST | MEC | TGC | NAL | |
| DA6192 ( | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.023 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.094 | 4 |
| DA16875 (WGH resistant isolate 1) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.023 | 0.19 | 0.125 | 0.064 | 1.5 |
| DA17847 (LL-37 resistant isolate 2) | 0.094 | 0.047 | 0.023 | 0.38 | 0.094 | 0.064 | 2 |
| DA16874 (LL-37 resistant isolate 1) | 0.19 | 0.047 | 0.032 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.064 | 2 |
| DA17610 (CNY100HLresistant isolate 1) | 0.19 | 0.064 | 0.032 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.064 | 4 |
| DA22427 ( | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.023 | 0.25 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 3 |
| DA23175 ( | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.032 | 0.25 | 0.094 | 0.094 | 4 |
| DA23307 ( | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.032 | 0.19 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 4 |
| DA23899 ( | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.047 | 0.5 | 0.125 | 0.094 | 2 |
CR (cefpirome), FEP (cefepime), MEM (meropenem), CST (colistin), MEC (mecillinam),TGC (Tigecyclin), NAL (Nalidixic acid).
Mutation rate to rifampicin resistance.
| Strain | Mutation rate (per cell per generation) | Mutation rate relative to wild type |
| DA6079 ( | 4.2×10−9 | 1 |
| DA16874 (LL-37 resistant isolate1) | 2.6×10−6 | 620 |
| DA17847 (LL-37 resistant isolate 2) | 2.7×10−9 | 0.64 |
| DA16875 (WGH resistant isolate 1) | 3.1×10−9 | 0.74 |
| DA17610 (CNY100HL resistant isolate 1) | 6.9×10−9 | 1.6 |
| DA23040 ( | 1.25×10−6 | 298 |
| DA23042 (4597041::Kan) | 4.1×10−9 | 0.98 |