Zhe Jin1, Zhenfu Zhao, Yulan Cheng, Ming Dong, Xiaojing Zhang, Liang Wang, Xinmin Fan, Xianling Feng, Yuriko Mori, Stephen J Meltzer. 1. Department of Pathology, The Shenzhen University School of Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Micromolecule Innovative Drugs, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China; Laboratory of Chemical Genomics, School of Chemical Biology and Biotechnology, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endoglin (ENG) is a 180-kilodalton transmembrane glycoprotein that functions as a component of the transforming growth factor-β receptor complex. Recently, ENG promoter hypermethylation was reported in several human cancers. METHODS: The authors examined ENG promoter hypermethylation using real-time, quantitative, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction in 260 human esophageal tissues. RESULTS: ENG hypermethylation demonstrated highly discriminative receiver operating characteristic curve profiles, clearly distinguishing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) from normal esophagus (P<.01). It is interesting to note that ENG normalized methylation values were significantly higher in ESCC compared with normal tissue (P<.01) or EAC (P<.01). The ENG hypermethylation frequency was 46.2% in ESCC and 11.9% in normal esophageal tissue, but increased early and sequentially during EAC-associated neoplastic progression to 13.3% in Barrett metaplasia (BE), 25% in dysplastic BE, and 26.9% in frank EAC. ENG hypermethylation was significantly higher in normal esophageal tissue from patients with ESCC (mean, 0.0186) than in normal tissue from patients with EAC (mean, 0.0117; P<.05). Treatment of KYSE220 ESCC cells with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine was found to reverse ENG methylation and reactivate ENG mRNA expression. CONCLUSIONS: Promoter hypermethylation of ENG appears to be a frequent, tissue-specific event in human ESCC and exhibits a field defect with promising biomarker potential for the early detection of ESCC. In addition, ENG hypermethylation occurs in a subset of human EAC, and early during BE-associated esophageal neoplastic progression.
BACKGROUND:Endoglin (ENG) is a 180-kilodalton transmembrane glycoprotein that functions as a component of the transforming growth factor-β receptor complex. Recently, ENG promoter hypermethylation was reported in several humancancers. METHODS: The authors examinedENG promoter hypermethylation using real-time, quantitative, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction in 260 human esophageal tissues. RESULTS:ENG hypermethylation demonstrated highly discriminative receiver operating characteristic curve profiles, clearly distinguishing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) andesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) from normal esophagus (P<.01). It is interesting to note that ENG normalized methylation values were significantly higher in ESCC compared with normal tissue (P<.01) or EAC (P<.01). The ENG hypermethylation frequency was 46.2% in ESCC and 11.9% in normal esophageal tissue, but increased early and sequentially during EAC-associated neoplastic progression to 13.3% in Barrett metaplasia (BE), 25% in dysplasticBE, and 26.9% in frank EAC. ENG hypermethylation was significantly higher in normal esophageal tissue from patients with ESCC (mean, 0.0186) than in normal tissue from patients with EAC (mean, 0.0117; P<.05). Treatment of KYSE220 ESCC cells with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine was found to reverse ENG methylation and reactivate ENG mRNA expression. CONCLUSIONS: Promoter hypermethylation of ENG appears to be a frequent, tissue-specific event in human ESCC and exhibits a fielddefect with promising biomarker potential for the early detection of ESCC. In addition, ENG hypermethylation occurs in a subset of human EAC, and early during BE-associatedesophageal neoplastic progression.
Authors: Charles R Holst; Gerard J Nuovo; Manel Esteller; Karen Chew; Stephen B Baylin; James G Herman; Thea D Tlsty Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: E Fonsatti; L Del Vecchio; M Altomonte; L Sigalotti; M R Nicotra; S Coral; P G Natali; M Maio Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: K A McAllister; M A Baldwin; A K Thukkani; C J Gallione; J N Berg; M E Porteous; A E Guttmacher; D A Marchuk Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: F J Burrows; E J Derbyshire; P L Tazzari; P Amlot; A F Gazdar; S W King; M Letarte; E S Vitetta; P E Thorpe Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 12.531