Literature DB >> 23893876

Multiplicity: discussion points from the Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry multiplicity expert group.

Alan Phillips1, Chrissie Fletcher, Gary Atkinson, Eddie Channon, Abdel Douiri, Thomas Jaki, Jeff Maca, David Morgan, James Henry Roger, Paul Terrill.   

Abstract

In May 2012, the Committee of Health and Medicinal Products issued a concept paper on the need to review the points to consider document on multiplicity issues in clinical trials. In preparation for the release of the updated guidance document, Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry held a one-day expert group meeting in January 2013. Topics debated included multiplicity and the drug development process, the usefulness and limitations of newly developed strategies to deal with multiplicity, multiplicity issues arising from interim decisions and multiregional development, and the need for simultaneous confidence intervals (CIs) corresponding to multiple test procedures. A clear message from the meeting was that multiplicity adjustments need to be considered when the intention is to make a formal statement about efficacy or safety based on hypothesis tests. Statisticians have a key role when designing studies to assess what adjustment really means in the context of the research being conducted. More thought during the planning phase needs to be given to multiplicity adjustments for secondary endpoints given these are increasing in importance in differentiating products in the market place. No consensus was reached on the role of simultaneous CIs in the context of superiority trials. It was argued that unadjusted intervals should be employed as the primary purpose of the intervals is estimation, while the purpose of hypothesis testing is to formally establish an effect. The opposing view was that CIs should correspond to the test decision whenever possible.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hypothesis tests; multiplicity; secondary endpoints; simultaneous CIs; type I error

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23893876     DOI: 10.1002/pst.1584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  7 in total

1.  Immunogenicity and Safety of a Novel 13-Valent Pneumococcal Vaccine in Healthy Chinese Infants and Toddlers.

Authors:  Yuliang Zhao; Guohua Li; Shengli Xia; Qiang Ye; Lin Yuan; Hong Li; Jiangjiao Li; Jingjing Chen; Shuyuan Yang; Zhiwei Jiang; Guoqing Zhao; Rongcheng Li; Yanping Li; Jielai Xia; Zhen Huang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Adaptive graph-based multiple testing procedures.

Authors:  Florian Klinglmueller; Martin Posch; Franz Koenig
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 1.894

3.  A wild bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials.

Authors:  Antonia Zapf; Edgar Brunner; Frank Konietschke
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools.

Authors:  H J Alma; C de Jong; D Jelusic; M Wittmann; M Schuler; B J Kollen; R Sanderman; K Schultz; J W H Kocks; T Van der Molen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 5.  Factors influencing the statistical planning, design, conduct, analysis and reporting of trials in health care: A systematic review.

Authors:  Marina Zaki; Lydia O'Sullivan; Declan Devane; Ricardo Segurado; Eilish McAuliffe
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-01-29

Review 6.  Recommendations for designing and analysing multi-arm non-inferiority trials: a review of methodology and current practice.

Authors:  Jake Emmerson; Susan Todd; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Why are two mistakes not worse than one? A proposal for controlling the expected number of false claims.

Authors:  Thomas Jaki; Alice Parry
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.