Literature DB >> 23893619

Sonographic predictors of postnatal bowel atresia in fetal gastroschisis.

K R Goetzinger1, M G Tuuli, R E Longman, K M Huster, A O Odibo, A G Cahill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the association between antenatal bowel dilation and postnatal small-bowel atresia in fetal gastroschisis and to establish a threshold at which the risk of adverse neonatal outcome increases.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton gestations with an antenatal diagnosis of gastroschisis seen in our ultrasound unit from 2001 to 2010. We reviewed stored images from the last ultrasound examination before delivery, blinded to postnatal diagnoses and outcomes. Fetal intra- and extra-abdominal bowel dilation (IABD and EABD, respectively) and bowel-wall thickness were measured. Previously published definitions of bowel dilation, including > 6, > 10, > 14 and > 18 mm, were evaluated for association with the primary outcome of bowel atresia. The optimal threshold to define fetal bowel dilation was determined by evaluating the significance of association as well as test performance characteristics.
RESULTS: Of 109 consecutive patients with fetal gastroschisis, there were four cases of intrauterine fetal demise and three neonatal deaths. Of the 94 live births with complete outcome data, 39 (41.5%) had measurable IABD. There were 14 (14.9%) cases of bowel atresia. Using a threshold of > 14 mm, IABD was significantly associated with an increased risk for bowel atresia (relative risk, 3.1 (95% CI, 1.2-8.2)) with a sensitivity of 57.1%, specificity of 75.0%, positive predictive value of 28.6% and negative predictive value of 90.9%. IABD > 14 mm was also associated with a significantly longer stay in neonatal intensive care unit. There was no significant association between EABD and bowel atresia at any of the thresholds evaluated.
CONCLUSION: IABD > 14 mm is associated with an increased risk for postnatal bowel atresia in fetal gastroschisis. This finding may be useful in counseling patients regarding the anticipated postnatal course for their neonate.
Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal wall defect; bowel atresia; bowel dilation; bowel-wall thickening; gastroschisis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23893619      PMCID: PMC3968234          DOI: 10.1002/uog.12568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  18 in total

1.  Sonography of normal fetal bowel.

Authors:  S G Parulekar
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  The incidence of gastroschisis.

Authors:  Mark D Kilby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-04

3.  The incidence of gastroschisis: research urgently needs resources.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; Alessandra Lisi; Eduardo E Castilla
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-18

4.  Gastroschisis: a plea for risk categorization.

Authors:  K A Molik; C A Gingalewski; K W West; F J Rescorla; L R Scherer; S A Engum; J L Grosfeld
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 5.  Second-trimester intra-abdominal bowel dilation in fetuses with gastroschisis predicts neonatal bowel atresia.

Authors:  A M Nick; J P Bruner; R Moses; E Y Yang; T A Scott
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Gastroschisis in the United States 1988-2003: analysis and risk categorization of 4344 patients.

Authors:  F Abdullah; M A Arnold; R Nabaweesi; A C Fischer; P M Colombani; K D Anderson; H Lau; D C Chang
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Gastroschisis with intestinal atresia--predictive value of antenatal diagnosis and outcome of postnatal treatment.

Authors:  Marco Ghionzoli; Catherine P James; Anna L David; Dimple Shah; Aileen W C Tan; Joseph Iskaros; David P Drake; Joseph I Curry; Edward M Kiely; Kate Cross; Simon Eaton; Paolo De Coppi; Agostino Pierro
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Prenatal ultrasonographic gastrointestinal abnormalities in fetuses with gastroschisis do not correlate with postnatal outcomes.

Authors:  Andrea T Badillo; Holly L Hedrick; R Douglas Wilson; Enrico Danzer; Michael W Bebbington; Mark P Johnson; Kenneth W Liechty; Alan W Flake; N Scott Adzick
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Prenatal diagnosis of gastroschisis: development of objective sonographic criteria for predicting outcome.

Authors:  J C Langer; J Khanna; C Caco; E H Dykes; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Severity of intestinal damage in gastroschisis: correlation with prenatal sonographic findings.

Authors:  S J Bond; M R Harrison; R A Filly; P W Callen; R A Anderson; M S Golbus
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.545

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Gastroschisis: antenatal sonographic predictors of adverse neonatal outcome.

Authors:  Rachael Page; Zachary Michael Ferraro; Felipe Moretti; Karen Fung Kee Fung
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2014-12-22

2.  Ultrasound markers for prediction of complex gastroschisis and adverse outcome: longitudinal prospective nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  C C M M Lap; L R Pistorius; E J H Mulder; M Aliasi; W L M Kramer; C M Bilardo; T E Cohen-Overbeek; E Pajkrt; D Tibboel; R M H Wijnen; G H A Visser; G T R Manten
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Inflammatory duodenal necrosis complicating gastroschisis.

Authors:  Dina Fouad; Geraint J Lee; Manasvi Upadhyaya; David Drake
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.