Literature DB >> 23893359

Abnormal axial rotations in TKA contribute to reduced weightbearing flexion.

Bradley Meccia1, Richard D Komistek, Mohamed Mahfouz, Douglas Dennis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous in vivo fluoroscopy studies have documented that axial rotation for patients having a TKA was significantly less than those having a normal knee. In fact, many subjects having a TKA experience a reverse axial rotation pattern where the femur internally rotates with increasing flexion. However, no previous studies have been conducted to determine if this reverse axial rotation pattern affects TKA performance. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were: (1) Do normal and reverse axial rotation patterns of a TKA affect the maximum flexion angle postoperatively? (2) Does the axial rotation angle of the knee at maximum flexion during weightbearing impact the magnitude of the maximum flexion achieved in weightbearing?
METHODS: One hundred twenty patients having TKA, previously analyzed under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy and a three-dimensional model-fitting software package, were further evaluated to determine if reverse axial rotation patterns limit weightbearing TKA flexion. In this retrospective cohort, we identified 58 patients who had a normal axial rotation pattern (greater than 15° normal rotation). Sixty-two patients experienced greater than 3° of reverse axial rotation, defined as internal rotation of the femur relative to the tibia.
RESULTS: Patients having a normal axial rotation achieved greater weightbearing knee flexion than those with reverse axial rotation (115° versus 109°, p = 0.02). Additionally, patients with greater than 3° of normal axial rotation at maximum flexion had more flexion than those with less than 3° of normal axial rotation at ending flexion (115° versus 107°, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings show reverse axial rotation and a smaller magnitude of normal axial rotation reduce weightbearing knee flexion. This is likely the result of increased posterior movement of the lateral condyle and is an important consideration in future implant designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23893359      PMCID: PMC3889458          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3105-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  18 in total

1.  Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Richard D Komistek; Mohamed R Mahfouz; Brian D Haas; James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A robust method for registration of three-dimensional knee implant models to two-dimensional fluoroscopy images.

Authors:  Mohamed R Mahfouz; William A Hoff; Richard D Komistek; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Can high-flexion tibial inserts improve range of motion after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Bradley D Crow; Julie C McCauley; Kace A Ezzet
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Knee biomechanics early after knee replacement surgery predict abnormal gait patterns 12 months postoperatively.

Authors:  Pazit Levinger; Hylton B Menz; Adam D Morrow; Margaret A Perrott; John R Bartlett; Julian A Feller; Neil B Bergman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Total knee arthroplasty in patients 40 years and younger.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Siraj A Sayeed; Obi Osuji; Aaron J Johnson; Qais Naziri; Ronald E Delanois; Peter M Bonutti
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  In vivo normal knee kinematics: is ethnicity or gender an influencing factor?

Authors:  Filip Leszko; Kristen R Hovinga; Amy L Lerner; Richard D Komistek; Mohamed R Mahfouz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The Cardiff Arthroplasty Satisfaction Index (CASI). A simple tool for the assessment of outcome following knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter J Kempshall; Ben A Hickey; Andrew J Metcalfe
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  The incidence of knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis grows rapidly among baby boomers: a population-based study in Finland.

Authors:  Jarkko Leskinen; Antti Eskelinen; Heini Huhtala; Pekka Paavolainen; Ville Remes
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-02

Review 9.  Patient satisfaction after total knee and hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rick L Lau; Rajiv Gandhi; Safiyyah Mahomed; Nizar Mahomed
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 3.076

10.  In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee.

Authors:  Richard D Komistek; Douglas A Dennis; Mohamed Mahfouz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  Accurate Prediction of Knee Angles during Open-Chain Rehabilitation Exercises Using a Wearable Array of Nanocomposite Stretch Sensors.

Authors:  David S Wood; Kurt Jensen; Allison Crane; Hyunwook Lee; Hayden Dennis; Joshua Gladwell; Anne Shurtz; David T Fullwood; Matthew K Seeley; Ulrike H Mitchell; William F Christensen; Anton E Bowden
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Medial parapatellar approach leads to internal rotation of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Filippo-Franco Schiapparelli; Felix Amsler; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Are TKA Kinematics During Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises Associated with Patient-reported Outcomes? A Preliminary Analysis.

Authors:  Stefaan Van Onsem; Matthias Verstraete; Wies Van Eenoo; Catherine Van Der Straeten; Jan Victor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Differences in anatomy and kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA patients: influence on implant positioning and subsequent loading conditions in mobile bearing knees.

Authors:  Allan Maas; Tae Kyun Kim; Rolf K Miehlke; Thomas Hagen; Thomas M Grupp
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Assessment of paradoxical anterior translation in a CR total knee prosthesis coupling dynamic RSA and FE techniques.

Authors:  Agostino Igor Mirulla; Laura Bragonzoni; Stefano Zaffagnini; Tommaso Ingrassia; Raffaele Zinno; Bernardo Innocenti
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-07-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.