| Literature DB >> 23892581 |
M Kumar-Pelayo1, M Oller-Cramsie, N Mihu, C Harden.
Abstract
Our video-EEG monitoring (VEEG) unit is part of a typical metropolitan tertiary care center that services a diverse patient population. We aimed to determine if the specific clinical reason for inpatient VEEG was actually resolved. Our method was to retrospectively determine the stated goal of inpatient VEEG and to analyze the outcome of one hundred consecutive adult patients admitted for VEEG. The reason for admission fit into one of four categories: 1) to characterize paroxysmal events as either epileptic or nonepileptic, 2) to localize epileptic foci, 3) to characterize the epilepsy syndrome, and 4) to attempt safe antiepileptic drug adjustment. We found that VEEG was successful in accomplishing the goal of admission in 77% of cases. The remaining 23% failed primarily due to lack of typical events during monitoring. Furthermore, of the overall study cohort, VEEG outcomes altered medical management in 53% and surgery was pursued in 5%.Entities:
Keywords: Epilepsy center; Epilepsy characterization; Epilepsy localization; Question for admission; Retrospective study; Tertiary care center; Utility of video-EEG; Video-EEG and medications; Video-EEG and surgery; Video-EEG monitoring
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23892581 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.06.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epilepsy Behav ISSN: 1525-5050 Impact factor: 2.937