Literature DB >> 23892526

Cervical lymph node dissection for clinically submucosal carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.

Shin-ichi Kosugi1, Yoshihiko Kawaguchi, Tatsuo Kanda, Takashi Ishikawa, Kaoru Sakamoto, Hidenori Akaike, Hideki Fujii, Toshifumi Wakai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were to clarify the risk factors for supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) metastasis and the survival benefit from cervical lymph node (LN) dissections in patients with clinically submucosal (cT1b) carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.
METHODS: A total of 86 patients with this disease who underwent esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard model were used to identify the independent risk factors for SCLN metastasis and prognostic factors, respectively. An index calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis at nodal basin and the 5-year overall survival rate of patients with metastasis at that basin were used to assess the therapeutic outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 40 patients (47%) were found to have pathological LN metastasis. Also, 13 patients (15%) had cervical LN metastasis: 6 and 7 with carcinoma of the upper and mid-thoracic esophagus, respectively. SCLN metastasis was found in 6 patients (7%); however, there was no independent risk factor for SCLN metastasis. The 5-year overall survival rate was 72.5%. Cervical LN metastasis was an independent prognostic factor (p = .04; odds ratio 2.55; 95% confidence interval 1.03-6.31); however, there was no significant difference in survival between patients with SCLN metastasis and those without (p = .06). The calculated index of estimated benefit from cervical LN dissections was 6.9, following upper mediastinal LN of 15.6 and perigastric LN of 8.3.
CONCLUSIONS: We could not identify risk factors to predict SCLN metastasis. Cervical LN dissection should not be omitted in patients with cT1b carcinoma, especially of the upper and mid-thoracic esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23892526     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3141-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  5 in total

Review 1.  The extent of lymphadenectomy in esophageal resection for cancer should be standardized.

Authors:  Eliza R C Hagens; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Miguel A Cuesta; Suzanne S Gisbertz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The clinical significance of the intraoperative pathological examination of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes using frozen sections in cervical field lymph node dissection of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinxin Xu; Bin Zheng; Shuliang Zhang; Taidui Zeng; Hao Chen; Wei Zheng; Chun Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  A new classification of lymph node metastases according to the lymph node stations for predicting prognosis in surgical patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Zheng Lin; Weilin Chen; Yuanmei Chen; Xiane Peng; Kunshou Zhu; Yimin Lin; Qiaokuang Lin; Zhijian Hu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-15

4.  Long non-coding RNA SPRY4-IT1 as a promising indicator for three field lymph-node dissection of thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Peng Qie; Qifan Yin; Xuejiao Xun; Yongbin Song; Shaohui Zhou; Huining Liu; Junpeng Feng; Ziqiang Tian
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Prognostic value of supraclavicular nodes and upper abdominal nodes metastasis after definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xue Li; Lujun Zhao; Wencheng Zhang; Chengwen Yang; Zhen Lian; Shuai Wang; Ningbo Liu; Qingsong Pang; Ping Wang; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.