Literature DB >> 23892321

Socioeconomic status affects the prevalence, but not the perinatal outcomes, of in vitro fertilization pregnancies.

Sari Räisänen1, Kaisa Randell, Henriette Svarre Nielsen, Mika Gissler, Michael R Kramer, Reija Klemetti, Seppo Heinonen.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Does maternal socioeconomic status (SES) confound or modify the association between IVF and perinatal outcome among singleton births? SUMMARY ANSWER: There were substantial socioeconomic differences in the frequency of IVF pregnancies, but maternal SES was not associated with the outcome of IVF pregnancies. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The use of IVF is associated with SES. Additionally, women with lower SES tend to have an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth and small for gestational age birth. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We conducted a population-based cohort study using the Finnish Medical Birth Register (2006-2010). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: We analyzed the total population of singleton births in Finland (n = 291 004) and then compared the unadjusted and adjusted incidences of adverse perinatal outcomes for singleton births after IVF (n = 5647) and non-IVF pregnancies (n = 285 357) in relation to SES. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: SES did not confound or modify the association between IVF and perinatal outcomes after adjustments for age, parity, smoking, gestational diabetes, maternal diabetes and pre-eclampsia. However, the prevalence of IVF pregnancies increased with SES; on average 1.9% of singleton infants were born after IVF pregnancies, while the corresponding percentages were 3.2 and 1.2% for the highest and lowest SES strata, respectively. IVF was statistically significantly associated with 1.27-, 1.49-, 1.63-, 1.47-, 1.35-, 1.40-, 4.97- and 1.14-fold higher incidences of admission to a neonatal unit, stillbirth, preterm birth, low birthweight, low Apgar scores (<7 at 5 min), Cesarean section, placenta previa and major congenital anomaly, respectively. Irrespective of the SES group, women who became pregnant through IVF were older and more often nulliparous and non-smokers compared with women with non-IVF pregnancies. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The occupation of 22% of the women was unknown and that of a further 25% did not match any of the criteria for our SES strata. Additionally, infertility is a problem for couples but the definition of SES in this study was based only on the mother's occupation at the time of birth. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The prevalence of IVF-conceived pregnancies was highest among the highest SES group, but SES did not confound the perinatal outcomes of IVF pregnancies after adjusting for background factors. However, the magnitude of risks associated with the IVF technique itself may be more significant than previously thought. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None of the authors received any funding specifically for this study, and we have no competing interests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; birth; perinatal outcome; population register; socioeconomic factors

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23892321     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  10 in total

1.  Are There Differences in Marital-Role Quality between Women and Their Male Partners Who Conceived Via IVF and Those Who Did Not?

Authors:  Morine Cebert; Susan Silva; Eleanor L Stevenson
Journal:  J Best Pract Health Prof Divers       Date:  2019

2.  Influence of delivery characteristics and socioeconomic status on giving birth by caesarean section - a cross sectional study during 2000-2010 in Finland.

Authors:  Sari Räisänen; Mika Gissler; Michael R Kramer; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Maternal socioeconomic status and the risk of asthma among offspring.

Authors:  Maijakaisa Harju; Leea Keski-Nisula; Leena Georgiadis; Kaisa Raatikainen; Sari Räisänen; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization in Estonia: a register-based study of complications and adverse outcomes in relation to the maternal socio-demographic background.

Authors:  Kaja Rahu; Kärt Allvee; Helle Karro; Mati Rahu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder Complicated with Endometriosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shinya Matsuzaki; Yutaka Ueda; Yoshikazu Nagase; Satoko Matsuzaki; Mamoru Kakuda; Sahori Kakuda; Hitomi Sakaguchi; Tsuyoshi Hisa; Shoji Kamiura
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-02-06

6.  Adolescent attachment to parents and peers in singletons and twins born with assisted and natural conception.

Authors:  M S Flykt; M Prince; M Vänskä; J Lindblom; J Minkkinen; A Tiitinen; P Poikkeus; Z Biringen; R-L Punamäki
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-03-08

7.  Placenta previa and the risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age newborn.

Authors:  Sari Räisänen; Vijaya Kancherla; Michael R Kramer; Mika Gissler; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Traits of patients seen via telemedicine versus in person for new-patient visits in a fertility practice.

Authors:  Vinita M Alexander; Allison P Schelble; Kenan R Omurtag
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-04-15

9.  The demographics of assisted reproductive technology births in a Nordic country.

Authors:  Alice Goisis; Siri Eldevik Håberg; Hans Ivar Hanevik; Maria Christine Magnus; Øystein Kravdal
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Quality of IVF status registration in the Estonian Medical Birth Registry: a national record linkage study.

Authors:  Kärt Allvee; Mati Rahu; Kai Haldre; Helle Karro; Kaja Rahu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.223

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.