Literature DB >> 23891846

From molecule to market access: drug regulatory science as an upcoming discipline.

Christine C Gispen-de Wied1, Hubertus G M Leufkens2.   

Abstract

Regulatory science as a discipline has evolved over the past years with the object to boost and promote scientific rationale behind benefit/risk and decision making by regulatory authorities. The European Medicines Agency, EMA, the Food and Drug Administration, FDA, and the Japanese Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency, PMDA, highlighted in their distinct ways the importance of regulatory science as a basis of good quality assessment in their strategic plans. The Medicines Evaluation Board, MEB, states: 'regulatory science is the science of developing and validating new standards and tools to evaluate and assess the benefit/risk of medicinal products, facilitating sound and transparent regulatory decision making'. Through analysis of regulatory frameworks itself and their effectiveness, however, regulatory science can also advance knowledge of these systems in general. The comprehensive guidance that is issued to complete an application dossier for regulatory product approval has seldomly been scrutinized for its efficiency. Since it is the task of regulatory authorities to protect and promote public health, it is understood that they take a cautious approach in regulating drugs prior to market access. In general, the authorities are among the first to be blamed if dangerous or useless drugs were allowed to the market. Yet, building a regulatory framework that is not challenged continuously in terms of deliverables for public health and cost-effectiveness, might be counterproductive in the end. Regulatory science and research can help understand how and why regulatory decisions are made, and where renewed discussions may be warranted. The MEB supports regulatory science as an R&D activity to fuel primary regulatory processes on product evaluation and vigilance, but also invests in a 'looking into the mirror' approach. Along the line of the drug life-cycle, publicly available data are reviewed and their regulatory impact highlighted. If made explicit, regulatory research can open the door to evidence based regulatory practice and serve the regulator's contribution to innovative drug licensing today.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benefit-risk assessment; Drug development; Market authorization; Post-marketing surveillance; Regulatory science

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23891846     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0014-2999            Impact factor:   4.432


  5 in total

1.  Prescription behavior for gastroprotective drugs in new users as a result of communications regarding clopidogrel - proton pump inhibitor interaction.

Authors:  Willemien J Kruik-Kollöffel; Job van der Palen; H Joost Kruik; Myrthe P P van Herk-Sukel; Kris L L Movig
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2016-07-18

2.  Global Development of Anticancer Therapies for Rare Cancers, Pediatric Cancers, and Molecular Subtypes of Common Cancers.

Authors:  H Kim Lyerly; Jun Ren; Renzo Canetta; Gi Hyun Kim; Sumimasa Nagai; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Ken Hatogai; Hiroshi Katayama; Silvy Da Rocha Dias; Daniel McManus; Kathy Soltys; Zhimin Yang; Olufumilayo Olopade; Nancy Goodman; Greg Reaman; Thomas Gross
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-12

Review 3.  Applying regulatory science in traditional chinese medicines for improving public safety and facilitating innovation in China: a scoping review and regulatory implications.

Authors:  Zuanji Liang; Yunfeng Lai; Meng Li; Junnan Shi; Chi Ieong Lei; Hao Hu; Carolina Oi Lam Ung
Journal:  Chin Med       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 5.455

Review 4.  Advancing the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Products: A Comparison of Five Regulatory Systems on Traditional Medicines with a Long History of Use.

Authors:  Zuanji Liang; Hao Hu; Junlei Li; Dongning Yao; Yitao Wang; Carolina Oi Lam Ung
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 5.  BEACON: A Summary Framework to Overcome Potential Reimbursement Hurdles.

Authors:  William C N Dunlop; C Daniel Mullins; Olaf Pirk; Ron Goeree; Maarten J Postma; Ashley Enstone; Louise Heron
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.981

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.