Literature DB >> 23891754

Ventral striatum is related to within-subject learning performance.

M Vink1, P Pas, E Bijleveld, R Custers, T E Gladwin.   

Abstract

Learning from feedback involves a network of various cortical and subcortical regions. Although activation in this network has been shown to be especially strong in successful learners, it is currently unclear which of these regions are related to within-subject variation in learning performance. To this aim, 21 subjects performed a probabilistic feedback-learning task consisting of multiple independent Learning blocks and non-learning Control blocks, while functional magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired. In agreement with previous studies, activation in anterior, lateral and medial left prefrontal cortex, insula and superior and inferior parietal cortical regions were found when contrasting Learning and Control blocks. Furthermore, activation in the supplementary motor area, anterior cingulate cortex and bilateral striatum was associated specifically with the learning phase and not the application phase during Learning blocks. Finally, activation only in the ventral striatum was associated with within-subject learning performance across the Learning blocks. Taken together, these latter two results are argued to provide the answer to the main research question: ventral striatum activation is associated with within-subject variations in learning performance. The ventral striatum appears to play a vital role in learning by adjusting behavior based on feedback.
Copyright © 2013 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACC; PFC; SMA; anterior cingulate cortex; fMRI; feedback learning; functional magnetic resonance imaging; prefrontal cortex; supplementary motor area; ventral striatum

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23891754     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  10 in total

1.  Fronto-striatal dysfunction during reward processing in unaffected siblings of schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Max de Leeuw; René S Kahn; Matthijs Vink
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Impact of aging on frontostriatal reward processing.

Authors:  Matthijs Vink; Iris Kleerekooper; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Rene S Kahn
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Frontostriatal activity and connectivity increase during proactive inhibition across adolescence and early adulthood.

Authors:  Matthijs Vink; Bram B Zandbelt; Thomas Gladwin; Manon Hillegers; Janna Marie Hoogendam; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Stefan Du Plessis; René S Kahn
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Elaborative feedback: Engaging reward and task-relevant brain regions promotes learning in pseudoword reading aloud.

Authors:  Samantha R Mattheiss; Edward J Alexander; William W Graves
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Different developmental trajectories for anticipation and receipt of reward during adolescence.

Authors:  Janna Marie Hoogendam; René S Kahn; Manon H J Hillegers; Mariët van Buuren; Matthijs Vink
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 6.464

6.  Neural correlates of state-based decision-making in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; Tyler Davis; Marissa A Gorlick; Jessica A Cooper; Akram Bakkour; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Distinct neural responses to conscious versus unconscious monetary reward cues.

Authors:  Erik Bijleveld; Ruud Custers; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Henk Aarts; Pascal Pas; Matthijs Vink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Effort responses to suboptimal reward cues are related to striatal dopaminergic functioning.

Authors:  Pascal Pas; Ruud Custers; Erik Bijleveld; Matthijs Vink
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2014

9.  Using subjective expectations to model the neural underpinnings of proactive inhibition.

Authors:  Pascal Pas; Stefan Du Plessis; Hanna E van den Munkhof; Thomas E Gladwin; Matthijs Vink
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 10.  The Striatum and Subthalamic Nucleus as Independent and Collaborative Structures in Motor Control.

Authors:  Alia Tewari; Rachna Jog; Mandar S Jog
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.