Literature DB >> 2389156

The making of a medical tradition: vaginal birth after cesarean.

C S McClain1.   

Abstract

By 1982, both the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists had recommended that hospitals adopt policies favoring vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Yet VBAC has since made only small inroads against repeat cesarean section and is primarily popular among progressive obstetricians and middle-class women wanting to experience natural childbirth and to avoid surgery. This study was undertaken to learn why, in hospitals permitting and ostensibly encouraging VBAC, some obstetrical patients choose 'trial of labor' for vaginal delivery, and others choose elective repeat cesarean section. Interviews with 100 women showed that the choice of a delivery method was largely influenced by the respondents' interactions with physicians, their reconstructions of the meanings of the previous cesarean section, and their personal ideologies about reproduction and motherhood. Ethnic minority women exhibited a greater preference for elective repeat cesarean than did white women. Caution is nevertheless urged in overinterpreting the significance of patient ethnicity for the continued popularity of elective repeat cesarean surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2389156     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90062-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  6 in total

1.  Women's Preferences Regarding the Processes and Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Anjali J Kaimal; William A Grobman; Allison S Bryant; Laura Norrell; Yamilee Bermingham; Anna Altshuler; Mari-Paule Thiet; Juan Gonzalez; Peter Bacchetti; Michelle Moghadassi; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Delivery route preferences of urban women of low socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Bela Kudish; Shobha Mehta; Michael Kruger; Evie Russell; Robert J Sokol
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  Elective repeat cesarean sections: how many could be vaginal births?

Authors:  P Norman; S Kostovcik; A Lanning
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Factors influencing the practice of vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  G Goldman; R Pineault; L Potvin; R Blais; H Bilodeau
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Erica Wu; Anjali J Kaimal; Kathryn Houston; Lynn M Yee; Sanae Nakagawa; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Patient decision aid for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) versus planned repeat cesarean delivery: a quasi-experimental pre-post study.

Authors:  Kartik K Venkatesh; Suzanne Brodney; Michael J Barry; Jamie Jackson; Kiira M Lyons; Asha N Talati; Thomas S Ivester; Maria C Munoz; John M Thorp; Wanda K Nicholson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.