Literature DB >> 23891503

Diagnostic spectrum of ovarian masses in women with breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging: histopathology correlation.

Amal Abd El hafez1, Amir Monir.   

Abstract

This study addresses the clinical problem of the patient with breast cancer that has been operated on for an ovarian mass. It specifies the spectrum of histopathologic diagnoses and the differentiating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of ovarian masses with correlations between clinical features, histopathologic, and MRI findings. Sensitivity and specificity of MRI vs histopathology in diagnosing malignancy are estimated. The study included 53 women with breast cancer who underwent surgery for an ovarian mass. Complete medical records, US and MRI images for the ovarian mass, and histopathology slides of both breast and ovarian resection specimens were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively. Thirty-six (67.9 %) patients had benign masses, and 17 (32.1%) had malignant masses, of which 8 (15.1%) were primary ovarian malignancies and 9 (17%) were metastatic from breast carcinomas. There was a significant association between benign and primary malignant ovarian masses and stage II breast cancer (P = .00). There was a significant association between metastatic ovarian masses and stage III to IV breast disease (P = .00) and negative estrogen receptor status (P = .05). Magnetic resonance imaging had a specificity of 91.7% and a sensitivity of 94.1% in diagnosing malignant ovarian masses. In conclusion, the spectrum of ovarian masses diagnosed in patients with breast cancer is broad, including benign lesions, primary ovarian malignancies, and breast metastases. Knowledge of the imaging features may allow a specific diagnosis aiding in surgical planning. Despite the high specificity and sensitivity of MRI to differentiate benign from malignant lesions, the unique ability to differentiate between primary and metastatic malignancies is conserved to histopathology.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histopathology; MRI; Metastatic breast cancer; Ovarian mass; Sensitivity; Specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23891503     DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2013.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol        ISSN: 1092-9134            Impact factor:   2.090


  3 in total

1.  Incidental diagnosis of breast cancer in the pursuit of the treatment of intestinal obstruction.

Authors:  Isabel Armas; Mariana Brandão; Inês Guerreiro; Inês Guerreiro; João Lobo; Carla Freitas; João Pinto-de-Sousa; Joaquim Abreu de Sousa
Journal:  Autops Case Rep       Date:  2019-02-25

2.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Whole-Body Computed Tomography for Incidental Ovarian Tumors in Patients with Prior Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Pei-Ching Huang; Ren-Chin Wu; Yu-Hsiang Juan; Hui-Yu Ho; Yung-Chang Lin; Yi-Ting Huang; Shu-Hang Ng; Chyong-Huey Lai; Angel Chao; Gigin Lin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29

3.  Long disease-free survival (48 months) in a breast cancer patient with ovarian and pelvic metastasis-a case report.

Authors:  Yu Feng; Xia Zhao; Shuzhen Lv; Bingjun Xiong; Yanping Li; Man Zhang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.