Literature DB >> 23891102

Phase II trial of proton beam accelerated partial breast irradiation in breast cancer.

Ji Hyun Chang1, Nam Kwon Lee, Ja Young Kim, Yeon-Joo Kim, Sung Ho Moon, Tae Hyun Kim, Joo-Young Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Kwan Ho Cho, Kyung Hwan Shin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Here, we report the results of our phase II, prospective study of proton beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (PB-APBI) in patients with breast cancer after breast conserving surgery (BCS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients diagnosed with breast cancer were treated with PB-APBI using a single-field proton beam or two fields after BCS. The treatment dose was 30 cobalt gray equivalent (CGE) in six CGE fractions delivered once daily over five consecutive working days.
RESULTS: All patients completed PB-APBI. The median follow-up time was 59 months (range: 43-70 months). Of the 30 patients, none had ipsilateral breast recurrence or regional or distant metastasis, and all were alive at the last follow-up. Physician-evaluated toxicities were mild to moderate, except in one patient who had severe wet desquamation at 2 months that was not observed beyond 6 months. Qualitative physician cosmetic assessments of good or excellent were noted in 83% and 80% of the patients at the end of PB-APBI and at 2 months, respectively, and decreased to 69% at 3 years. A good or excellent cosmetic outcome was noted in all patients treated with a two-field proton beam at any follow-up time point except for one. For all patients, the mean percentage breast retraction assessment (pBRA) value increased significantly during the follow-up period (p=0.02); however, it did not increase in patients treated with two-field PB-APBI (p=0.3).
CONCLUSIONS: PB-APBI consisting of 30 CGE in six CGE fractions once daily for five consecutive days can be delivered with excellent disease control and tolerable skin toxicity to properly selected patients with early-stage breast cancer. Multiple-field PB-APBI may achieve a high rate of good-to-excellent cosmetic outcomes. Additional clinical trials with larger patient groups are needed.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI); Breast cancer; Proton beam radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23891102     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  17 in total

Review 1.  New challenges in high-energy particle radiobiology.

Authors:  M Durante
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Promise and pitfalls of heavy-particle therapy.

Authors:  Timur Mitin; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A Technical Guide for Passive Scattering Proton Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Julie A Bradley; Meng Wei Ho; Zuofeng Li; Xiaoying Liang; Michael Rutenberg; Roi Dagan; Nancy P Mendenhall
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2017-07-11

4.  Air-electron stream interactions during magnetic resonance IGRT : Skin irradiation outside the treatment field during accelerated partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  Jong Min Park; Kyung Hwan Shin; Jung-In Kim; So-Yeon Park; Seung Hyuck Jeon; Noorie Choi; Jin Ho Kim; Hong-Gyun Wu
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Early toxicity in patients treated with postoperative proton therapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  John J Cuaron; Brian Chon; Henry Tsai; Anuj Goenka; David DeBlois; Alice Ho; Simon Powell; Eugen Hug; Oren Cahlon
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Novel applications of proton therapy in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  John J Cuaron; Shannon M MacDonald; Oren Cahlon
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08

Review 7.  Hypofractionated proton therapy in breast cancer: where are we? A critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Daniela Alterio; Eliana La Rocca; Maria Cristina Leonardi; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Stefania Volpe; Anna Maria Camarda; Alessia Casbarra; William Russell-Edu; Maria Alessia Zerella; Roberto Orecchia; Viviana Galimberti; Paolo Veronesi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  A Phase I/II Trial to Evaluate the Technical Feasibility of Partial Breast Irradiation with Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy in Korean Women with Stage I Breast Carcinoma: An Initial Report of the Korean Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (KROG) Study 0804.

Authors:  Jae-Uk Jeong; Jung Han Yoon; Min Ho Park; Mee Sun Yoon; Ju-Young Song; Taek-Keun Nam; Woong-Ki Chung; Yong-Hyub Kim; Chang-Ok Suh; Sung-Ja Ahn
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 9.  Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Consensus Statement From the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Breast Cancer Subcommittee.

Authors:  Robert W Mutter; J Isabelle Choi; Rachel B Jimenez; Youlia M Kirova; Marcio Fagundes; Bruce G Haffty; Richard A Amos; Julie A Bradley; Peter Y Chen; Xuanfeng Ding; Antoinette M Carr; Leslie M Taylor; Mark Pankuch; Raymond B Mailhot Vega; Alice Y Ho; Petra Witt Nyström; Lisa A McGee; James J Urbanic; Oren Cahlon; John H Maduro; Shannon M MacDonald
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 8.013

10.  Calculating Variations in Biological Effectiveness for a 62 MeV Proton Beam.

Authors:  Mario Pietro Carante; Francesca Ballarini
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.