Literature DB >> 23891058

Do larger femoral heads improve the functional outcome in total hip arthroplasty?

Charlotte L Allen1, Gary J Hooper2, Christopher M A Frampton3.   

Abstract

Use of larger diameter femoral heads has been popularised in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recent studies have implicated larger femoral heads in early failure. We evaluated what effect the size of the femoral head had on the early functional outcome in order to determine the optimal head size for the maximal functional outcome. There were 726 patients who underwent elective THA and were divided into 3 groups according to head size then compared with respect to functional outcome scores and dislocation rates. This study failed to show that increasing the size of the femoral head significantly improved the functional outcome at 1 year after total hip arthroplasty but that the use of a 36 mm or greater femoral head did reduce the dislocation rate.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional outcome; hip joint arthroplasty; large heads

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23891058     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  11 in total

1.  Characterization of Femoral Head Taper Corrosion Features Using a 22-Year Retrieval Database.

Authors:  Jacob Cartner; Patrick Aldinger; Chenxi Li; David Collins
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-08-12

2.  Soft tissue tension is four times lower in the unstable primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Ogawa; Masaki Takao; Hidetoshi Hamada; Takashi Sakai; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Outcome of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty with 4th Generation 36 mm Head Compared to that with 3rd Generation 28 mm Head by Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Soong Joon Lee; Kang Sup Yoon
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 4.  Large Diameter Head in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  G Neupane; R Madhusudhan; A Shrestha; R Vaishya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Short stem total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients 60 years or younger: a 3- to 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Antonio Capone; Fabrizio Bienati; Stefania Torchia; Daniele Podda; Giuseppe Marongiu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Head size in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georgios Tsikandylakis; Maziar Mohaddes; Peter Cnudde; Antti Eskelinen; Johan Kärrholm; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

7.  No benefit on functional outcomes and dislocation rates by increasing head size to 36 mm in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yu-Der Lu; Shih-Hsiang Yen; Feng-Chih Kuo; Jun-Wen Wang; Ching-Jen Wang
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.910

8.  The accuracy of digital templating in uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lukas A Holzer; Georg Scholler; Stefan Wagner; Jörg Friesenbichler; Werner Maurer-Ertl; Andreas Leithner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Hip Arthroplasty Instability After Implantation of a Spinal Cord Stimulator.

Authors:  Cambize Shahrdar; Kevin P Smidt
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-07

10.  Factors predicting hip joint aspiration yield or "dry taps" in patients with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Justin Ong; Alex Tang; Joshua C Rozell; James S Babb; Ran Schwarzkopf; Dana Lin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.