Literature DB >> 23891006

Reevaluation of the lumbosacral region of Oreopithecus bambolii.

Gabrielle A Russo1, Liza J Shapiro.   

Abstract

Functional interpretations of the postcranium of the late Miocene ape Oreopithecus bambolii are controversial. The claim that Oreopithecus practiced habitual terrestrial bipedalism is partly based on restored postcranial remains originally recovered from Baccinello, Tuscany (Köhler and Moyà-Solà, 1997). The lower lumbar vertebrae of BA#72 were cited as evidence that Oreopithecus exhibits features indicative of a lordotic lumbar spine, including dorsal wedging of the vertebral bodies and a caudally progressive increase in postzygapophyseal interfacet distance. Here, we demonstrate why the dorsal wedging index value obtained by Köhler and Moyà-Solà (1997) for the BA#72 last lumbar vertebra is questionable due to distortion in that region, present a more reliable way to measure postzygapophyseal interfacet distance, and include an additional metric (laminar width) with which to examine changes in the transverse dimensions of the neural arches. We also quantify the external morphology of the BA#72 proximal sacrum, which, despite well-documented links between sacral morphology and bipedal locomotion, and excellent preservation of the sacral prezygapophyses, first sacral vertebral body, and right ala, was not evaluated by Köhler and Moyà-Solà (1997). Measures of postzygapophyseal interfacet distance and laminar width on the penultimate and last lumbar vertebrae of BA#72 reveal a pattern encompassed within the range of living nonhuman hominoids and unlike that of modern humans, suggesting that Oreopithecus did not possess a lordotic lumbar spine. Results further show that the BA#72 sacrum exhibits relatively small prezygapophyseal articular facet surface areas and mediolaterally narrow alae compared with modern humans, indicating that the morphology of the Oreopithecus sacrum is incompatible with the functional demands of habitual bipedal stance and locomotion. The Oreopithecus lumbosacral region does not exhibit adaptations for habitual bipedal locomotion.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipedalism; Lumbar vertebrae; Oreopithecus; Sacrum

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23891006     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  6 in total

1.  A partial hominoid innominate from the Miocene of Pakistan: description and preliminary analyses.

Authors:  Michèle E Morgan; Kristi L Lewton; Jay Kelley; Erik Otárola-Castillo; John C Barry; Lawrence J Flynn; David Pilbeam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The hominid ilium is shaped by a synapomorphic growth mechanism that is unique within primates.

Authors:  Dexter Zirkle; C Owen Lovejoy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  New fossils of Australopithecus sediba reveal a nearly complete lower back.

Authors:  Scott A Williams; Thomas Cody Prang; Marc R Meyer; Thierra K Nalley; Renier Van Der Merwe; Christopher Yelverton; Daniel García-Martínez; Gabrielle A Russo; Kelly R Ostrofsky; Jeffrey Spear; Jennifer Eyre; Mark Grabowski; Shahed Nalla; Markus Bastir; Peter Schmid; Steven E Churchill; Lee R Berger
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Standing up for the earliest bipedal hominins.

Authors:  Daniel E Lieberman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 69.504

5.  Insights into the lower torso in late Miocene hominoid Oreopithecus bambolii.

Authors:  Ashley S Hammond; Lorenzo Rook; Alisha D Anaya; Elisabetta Cioppi; Loïc Costeur; Salvador Moyà-Solà; Sergio Almécija
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  First steps of bipedality in hominids: evidence from the atelid and proconsulid pelvis.

Authors:  Allison L Machnicki; Linda B Spurlock; Karen B Strier; Philip L Reno; C Owen Lovejoy
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.