Literature DB >> 23890829

Is second generation metal-on-metal primary total hip arthroplasty with a 28 mm head a worthy option?: a 12- to 18-year follow-up study.

Kyu-Tae Hwang1, Young-Ho Kim, Yee-Suk Kim, Il-Yong Choi.   

Abstract

To determine whether MoM THA with a small head is still worthy of use, we investigated survivorship, complications, and factors influencing failure. Of 149 consecutive patients (195 hips), 141 (180 hips) of mean age 43 (19-55) years were available for review at a mean of 14.4 years postoperatively. Survivorship for cup revision for any cause was 97.8% at 18.4 years postoperatively. Nine hips generated complaints of groin pain; six showed periacetabular osteolysis, one had pain without radiological change, and two were diagnosed as symptomatic pseudotumors. Four of six hips with periacetabular osteolysis or aseptic loosening were revised. Surgery- and patient-related factors had no effect in results. Our results are encouraging, however, further study will be necessary to determine the incidence and fates of pseudotumors after MoM THA with a small head.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  metal on metal; pseudotumor; small head; survivorship; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23890829     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Revisions of Modular Metal-on-metal THA Have a High Risk of Early Complications.

Authors:  Peter F Sharkey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray; Ronan B C Treacy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Keri L Satterwhite
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The Epidemiology and National Trends of Bearing Surface Usage in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Korea.

Authors:  Pil Whan Yoon; Jeong Joon Yoo; Yunjung Kim; Seungmi Yoo; Sahnghoon Lee; Hee Joong Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-02-13

5.  Comparison of metal ion concentrations and implant survival after total hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal versus metal-on-polyethylene articulations.

Authors:  Henrik Dahlstrand; André Stark; Marius C Wick; Lucas Anissian; Nils P Hailer; Rüdiger J Weiss
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Long-Term Results of a Second-Generation, Small-Diameter, Metal-On-Metal Bearing in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty at 14-year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Tobias Reiner; Matthias C Klotz; Kirsten Seelmann; Fabian Hertzsch; Moritz M Innmann; Marcus R Streit; Timo A Nees; Babak Moradi; Christian Merle; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Tobias Gotterbarm
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Pseudotumours, cobalt and clinical outcome in small head metal-on-metal versus conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hugo C van der Veen; Inge Hf Reininga; Wierd P Zijlstra; Martijn F Boomsma; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Jos Jam van Raay
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Adverse Tissue Reactions and Metal Ion Behavior After Small-Head Metasul Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Tsunehito Ishida; Toshiyuki Tateiwa; Yasuhito Takahashi; Yohei Nishikawa; Takaaki Shishido; Toshinori Masaoka; Kengo Yamamoto
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.071

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.