Literature DB >> 23890806

Comparative effectiveness research - what is it and how does one do it?

Christopher H Goss1, Nathan Tefft.   

Abstract

Recent initiatives have increased focus on medical research that explores robust comparisons of clinical approaches broadly defined as comparative effectiveness research (CER). Federal mandates have generated definitions, established priorities, and offered organizational approaches for coordinating and conducting CER. This review will summarize the various definitions of CER, the role of cost assessment, and key study components of CER including study populations, study design, the use of secondary data, comparators employed in studies, outcome measures, and how results of CER should be disseminated.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords:  Comparative effectiveness research; Cost benefit analysis; Cost effectiveness analysis; Definitions; Paediatrics; Rare diseases

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23890806     DOI: 10.1016/j.prrv.2013.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Respir Rev        ISSN: 1526-0542            Impact factor:   2.726


  4 in total

Review 1.  Comparative effectiveness research in hand surgery.

Authors:  Shepard P Johnson; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 1.907

2.  A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) study of medication and CBT sequencing in the treatment of pediatric anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Bradley S Peterson; Amy E West; John R Weisz; Wendy J Mack; Michele D Kipke; Robert L Findling; Brian S Mittman; Ravi Bansal; Steven Piantadosi; Glenn Takata; Corinna Koebnick; Ceth Ashen; Christopher Snowdy; Marie Poulsen; Bhavana Kumar Arora; Courtney M Allem; Marisa Perez; Stephanie N Marcy; Bradley O Hudson; Stephanie H Chan; Robin Weersing
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.630

3.  Costs of diagnostic and preoperative workup with and without breast MRI in older women with a breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; Julie Weiss; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Rebecca A Hubbard; Louise M Henderson; Karla Kerlikowske; Martha E Goodrich; Cristina O'Donoghue; Karen J Wernli; Wendy B DeMartini; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Comparing the Effectiveness of Methods to Measure Oxygen in Tissues for Prognosis and Treatment of Cancer.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Victoria A Satinsky; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.