Literature DB >> 23890573

Differential impact of cilostazol on restenosis according to implanted stent type (from a pooled analysis of three DECLARE randomized trials).

Seung-Whan Lee1, Jung-Min Ahn, Seungbong Han, Gyung-Min Park, Young-Rak Cho, Woo-Seok Lee, Jeong-Yoon Jang, Chang-Hee Kwon, Jong-Young Lee, Won-Jang Kim, Soo-Jin Kang, Young-Hak Kim, Cheol-Whan Lee, Jae-Joong Kim, Seong-Wook Park, Seung-Jung Park.   

Abstract

Even in the drug-eluting stent era, restenosis has remained an unresolved issue, particularly in the treatment of complex coronary lesions. In this study, patient-level data from 3 randomized trials (Drug-Eluting Stenting Followed by Cilostazol Treatment Reduces Late Restenosis in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus [DECLARE-DIABETES] and Drug-Eluting Stenting Followed by Cilostazol Treatment Reduces Late Restenosis in Patients With Long Native Coronary Lesions [DECLARE-LONG] I and II) were pooled to estimate the differential antirestenotic efficacy of add-on cilostazol according to the implanted drug-eluting stent in patients at high risk for restenosis. A total of 1,399 patients underwent sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; n = 450), paclitaxel-eluting stent (n = 450), and zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 499) implantation and received triple-antiplatelet therapy (TAT; aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol, n = 700) and dual-antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel, n = 699). Randomization of antiplatelet regimen was stratified by stent type. In-stent late loss after TAT was significantly lower than that after dual-antiplatelet therapy, regardless of implanted stent type. However, the incidence of in-segment restenosis after TAT was significantly lower with SES (0.5% vs 6.7%, p = 0.014) and zotarolimus-eluting stent (12.2% vs 20.0%, p = 0.028) implantation but not paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (14.4% vs 20.0%, p = 0.244). A significant interaction was present between stent type and antiplatelet regimen for the risk for in-segment restenosis (p = 0.004). Post hoc analysis using bootstrap resampling methods showed that the relative risk reduction for in-segment restenosis after TAT was most prominent with SES implantation. In conclusion, add-on cilostazol effectively reduced restenosis in patients at high risk for restenosis, particularly in those receiving SES, suggesting the sustainable utility of add-on cilostazol therapy in newer generation drug-eluting stents with comparable efficacy with that of SES.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23890573     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Cilostazol ameliorates collagenase-induced cerebral hemorrhage by protecting the blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  Toshinori Takagi; Takahiko Imai; Keisuke Mishiro; Mitsue Ishisaka; Masanori Tsujimoto; Hideki Ito; Kazunori Nagashima; Haruka Matsukawa; Kazuhiro Tsuruma; Masamitsu Shimazawa; Shinichi Yoshimura; Osamu Kozawa; Toru Iwama; Hideaki Hara
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 2.  Cilostazol for intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Rachel Bedenis; Marlene Stewart; Marcus Cleanthis; Peter Robless; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Gerard Stansby
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-31

3.  Cilostazol for intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Tamara Brown; Rachel B Forster; Marcus Cleanthis; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Gerard Stansby; Marlene Stewart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.