| Literature DB >> 23890086 |
Zuo Di Liang, Xiu Ru Yin, Da Sheng Cai, Heng Zhou, Ling Pei.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) are a good alternative to multipotent stem cells for regenerative medicine. Low tidal volume (LVT) has proved to be an effective ventilation strategy. However, it is not known if ADSCs and LVT can protect against ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). This study was aimed to determine the potential of ADSCs and LVT to repair following VILI and to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for this section.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23890086 PMCID: PMC3734163 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Figure 1Surface markers and induced differentiation of ADSCs at passage 3. (A) CD29. (B) CD105. (C) CD90. (D) CD45. (E) CD14. (F) Oil Red-O staining of control micrograph. (G) Oil Red-O staining after adipogenic induction. (H) Alizarin red staining of control micrograph. (I) Alizarin red staining after osteogenic induction.
Figure 2Effect of ADSCs on lung histopathology. (A) Sham group. (B) HVT group (C) HVT + LVT group. (D) HVT + ADSCs group. (E) Lung injury score. (F) Lung wet/dry. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ## p < 0.01 vs sham group. **p < 0.01 vs HVT group. n = 6 animals in each group and each assay was repeated 3 times.
Figure 3Effects of ADSCs on total protein, neutrophil infiltration, cytokines and chemokines response in BALF. (A) BALF total protein. (B) neutrophil counts (C) TNF-α concentration (D) IL-6 concentration (E) TGF-β1 concentration (F) IL-β1 concentration (G) IL-10 concentration (H) KGF concentration. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ## p < 0.01 vs sham group. *p < 0.05 vs HVT group. **p < 0.01 vs HVT group. n = 6 animals in each group and each assay was repeated 3 times.
Figure 4Effects of ADSCs on gene and protein expression of ENaC subunits. (A–C) α-, β- and γ-ENaC relative mRNA level. (D–E) α-, β- and γ-ENaC protein expression. (F) Na,K-ATPase activity. (G) Alveolar Fluid Clearance. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ## p < 0.01 vs sham group. *p < 0.05 vs HVT group. **p < 0.01 vs HVT group. n = 6 animals in each group and each assay was repeated three times.