Literature DB >> 23889298

Categorization of fragrance contact allergens for prioritization of preventive measures: clinical and experimental data and consideration of structure-activity relationships.

Wolfgang Uter1, Jeanne D Johansen, Anna Börje, Ann-Therese Karlberg, Carola Lidén, Suresh Rastogi, David Roberts, Ian R White.   

Abstract

Contact allergy to fragrances is still relatively common, affecting ∼ 16% of patients patch tested for suspected allergic contact dermatitis, considering all current screening allergens. The objective of the review is to systematically retrieve, evaluate and classify evidence on contact allergy to fragrances, in order to arrive at recommendations for targeting of primary and secondary prevention. Besides published evidence on contact allergy in humans, animal data (local lymph node assay), annual use volumes and structure-activity relationships (SARs) were considered for an algorithmic categorization of substances as contact allergens. A total of 54 individual chemicals and 28 natural extracts (essential oils) can be categorized as established contact allergens in humans, including all 26 substances previously identified as contact allergens (SCCNFP/0017/98). Twelve of the 54 individual chemicals are considered to be of special concern, owing to the high absolute number of reported cases of contact allergy (>100). Additionally, 18 single substances and one natural mixture are categorized as established contact allergens in animals. SARs, combined with limited human evidence, contributed to the categorization of a further 26 substances as likely contact allergens. In conclusion, the presence of 127 single fragrance substances and natural mixtures should, owing to their skin sensitizing properties, be disclosed, for example on the label. As an additional preventive measure, the maximum use concentration of 11 substances of special concern should be limited to 100 ppm. The substance hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde and the two ingredients chloroatranol and atranol in the natural extracts Evernia prunastri and Evernia furfuracea should not be present in cosmetic products.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Directive 76/768/ECC; SCCS; fragrance allergens; labelling; scientific opinion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23889298     DOI: 10.1111/cod.12117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  6 in total

1.  Program for Contact Allergen Research (PPAC) - a new tool for dermatologists.

Authors:  Vanessa Barreto Rocha; Carla Jorge Machado; Flávia Vasques Bittencourt
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.896

2.  [Diagnostic workup of fragrance allergy].

Authors:  J Geier; W Uter
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Evaluation of biological and chemical insect repellents and their potential adverse effects.

Authors:  Margit Semmler; Fathy Abdel-Ghaffar; Jürgen Schmidt; Heinz Mehlhorn
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Modeling skin sensitization potential of mechanistically hard-to-be-classified aniline and phenol compounds with quantum mechanistic properties.

Authors:  Qin Ouyang; Lirong Wang; Ying Mu; Xiang-Qun Xie
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 5.  Contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends.

Authors:  W Uter
Journal:  Allergol Select       Date:  2017-08-04

Review 6.  Ubiquity, Hazardous Effects, and Risk Assessment of Fragrances in Consumer Products.

Authors:  María-Antonia Pastor-Nieto; María-Elena Gatica-Ortega
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Allergy       Date:  2021-01-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.