Literature DB >> 23888859

Quantitative genetic divergence and standing genetic (co)variance in thermal reaction norms along latitude.

David Berger1, Erik Postma, Wolf U Blanckenhorn, Richard J Walters.   

Abstract

Although the potential to adapt to warmer climate is constrained by genetic trade-offs, our understanding of how selection and mutation shape genetic (co)variances in thermal reaction norms is poor. Using 71 isofemale lines of the fly Sepsis punctum, originating from northern, central, and southern European climates, we tested for divergence in juvenile development rate across latitude at five experimental temperatures. To investigate effects of evolutionary history in different climates on standing genetic variation in reaction norms, we further compared genetic (co)variances between regions. Flies were reared on either high or low food resources to explore the role of energy acquisition in determining genetic trade-offs between different temperatures. Although the latter had only weak effects on the strength and sign of genetic correlations, genetic architecture differed significantly between climatic regions, implying that evolution of reaction norms proceeds via different trajectories at high latitude versus low latitude in this system. Accordingly, regional genetic architecture was correlated to region-specific differentiation. Moreover, hot development temperatures were associated with low genetic variance and stronger genetic correlations compared to cooler temperatures. We discuss the evolutionary potential of thermal reaction norms in light of their underlying genetic architectures, evolutionary histories, and the materialization of trade-offs in natural environments.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptation; G-matrix; genetic constraint; resource acquisition; temperature; trade-off

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23888859     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  Ontogenetic changes in genetic variances of age-dependent plasticity along a latitudinal gradient.

Authors:  V Nilsson-Örtman; B Rogell; R Stoks; F Johansson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Largely flat latitudinal life history clines in the dung fly Sepsis fulgens across Europe (Diptera: Sepsidae).

Authors:  Jeannine Roy; Wolf U Blanckenhorn; Patrick T Rohner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Are we underestimating the genetic variances of dimorphic traits?

Authors:  Matthew E Wolak; Derek A Roff; Daphne J Fairbairn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  The alignment between phenotypic plasticity, the major axis of genetic variation and the response to selection.

Authors:  Martin I Lind; Kylie Yarlett; Julia Reger; Mauricio J Carter; Andrew P Beckerman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Adaptation potential of the copepod Eurytemora affinis to a future warmer Baltic Sea.

Authors:  Konrad Karlsson; Monika Winder
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Implications of existing local (mal)adaptations for ecological forecasting under environmental change.

Authors:  Richard J Walters; David Berger
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Genetic constraints predict evolutionary divergence in Dalechampia blossoms.

Authors:  Geir H Bolstad; Thomas F Hansen; Christophe Pélabon; Mohsen Falahati-Anbaran; Rocío Pérez-Barrales; W Scott Armbruster
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Variation in spawning time promotes genetic variability in population responses to environmental change in a marine fish.

Authors:  Rebekah A Oomen; Jeffrey A Hutchings
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 9.  Genetic adaptation as a biological buffer against climate change: Potential and limitations.

Authors:  Luc De Meester; Robby Stoks; Kristien I Brans
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.654

10.  Genetic Constraints, Transcriptome Plasticity, and the Evolutionary Response to Climate Change.

Authors:  Michael L Logan; Christian L Cox
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.599

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.