Literature DB >> 23888842

Identification of genetically linked female preference and male trait.

Vanda T K McNiven1, Amanda J Moehring.   

Abstract

Genetic variation in male traits and the female preferences for those traits allows for the evolution of sexual behavior. Trait-preference combinations are thought to improve the effectiveness of runaway sexual selection within a species, and are considered necessary for the induction of divergence between species. Novel traits, or variants of existing traits, and their associated preferences in the opposite sex are more likely to be maintained if they are genetically linked in proximity on a chromosome (the genetic coupling hypothesis), yet there is little empirical evidence that this genetic linkage occurs. Here we show for the first time that natural genetic variation at a single-linked region can induce both species-specific female choosiness and the male trait they are discriminating against. We found this effect in two separate regions of the genome, demonstrating that this linkage may be common. In contrast, female choosiness and male unattractiveness could not be alleviated by a single region. The close linkage of these loci and the strength of their effect provide an evolutionary means by which this preference-trait combination could arise and be maintained, thus enabling a more rapid route for runaway sexual selection, and providing empirical evidence supporting the genetic coupling hypothesis.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; introgression; reproductive isolation; signaling / courtship; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23888842     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  Genetic coupling of signal and preference facilitates sexual isolation during rapid speciation.

Authors:  Mingzi Xu; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Moving Speciation Genetics Forward: Modern Techniques Build on Foundational Studies in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dean M Castillo; Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The fruitless gene affects female receptivity and species isolation.

Authors:  Tabashir Chowdhury; Ryan M Calhoun; Katrina Bruch; Amanda J Moehring
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Evolutionary novelty in communication between the sexes.

Authors:  E Dale Broder; Damian O Elias; Rafael L Rodríguez; Gil G Rosenthal; Brett M Seymoure; Robin M Tinghitella
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Context matters: sexual signaling loss in digital organisms.

Authors:  Emily G Weigel; Nicholas D Testa; Alex Peer; Sara C Garnett
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Individual Genetic Contributions to Genital Shape Variation between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana.

Authors:  Hélène LeVasseur-Viens; Amanda J Moehring
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2014-09-08

7.  Genetic dissection of assortative mating behavior.

Authors:  Richard M Merrill; Pasi Rastas; Simon H Martin; Maria C Melo; Sarah Barker; John Davey; W Owen McMillan; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  How phenotypic matching based on neutral mating cues enables speciation in locally adapted populations.

Authors:  Richard M Sibly; Mark Pagel; Robert N Curnow; Jonathan Edwards
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Intraspecific Genetic Variation for Behavioral Isolation Loci in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jessica A Pardy; Samia Lahib; Mohamed A F Noor; Amanda J Moehring
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.