Literature DB >> 23888476

Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the prostate: comparison of gadobutrol and Gd-DTPA.

T Durmus1, B Vollnberg, C Schwenke, E Kilic, A Huppertz, M Taupitz, T Franiel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the enhancement profile of the macrocyclic contrast medium (CM) gadobutrol in comparison to linear CM Gd-DTPA in DCE-MRI of the prostate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total 53 patients with prostata cancer (PCa) were included, who received a radical prostatectomy after multiparametric MRI of the prostate including DCE-MRI. Using circular regions of interests normal peripheral zone (PZ) and PCa foci > 5 mm in diameter (42 and 34 foci in Gd-DTPA and gadobutrol group, respectively) were analysed in DCE-MRI. Enhancement curves (Type I, II and III) and pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively and compared using mixed linear models (two sided p-values < 0.05 were regarded significant).
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in frequencies of curve types I, II or III in the normal PZ (p = 0.63) or in PCa foci (p = 0.75). PCa with a Gleason score ≥ 7 had in comparison to Gleason ≤ 6 significantly more often a Wash-Out-curve (Type III) with both CM (p = 0.02). The relative peak enhancement was in the PZ (Gd-DTPA 1.4 a. u. [1.20; 1.59], gadobutrol 1.58 a. u. [1.37; 1.78]) and in PCa foci (Gd-DTPA 1.56 a. u. [1.41; 1.71], gadobutrol 1.76 a. u. [1.59; 1.94]) significantly higher with gadobutrol (p = 0.04). The pharmacokinetic parameters Ktrans und kep were higher in PCa foci than in PZ (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.002, respectively) without significant difference of the parameter values between both CM (p = 0.65).
CONCLUSION: [corrected] This study is the first systematic comparison of gadobutrol and Gd-DTPA in DCE-MRI of the prostate. The relative peak enhancement is higher using gadobutrol compared to Gd-DTPA in DCE-MRI. There was no statistically significant difference in curve types or the pharmacokinetic parameters in PCa or normal PZ between both CM. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23888476     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1335892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  4 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: intraindividual comparison of gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol.

Authors:  Chau Hung Lee; Balamurugan Vellayappan; Matthias Taupitz; Bernd Hamm; Patrick Asbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Quantitative graphical analysis of simultaneous dynamic PET/MRI for assessment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Thomas Koesters; Anne-Kristin Vahle; Kent Friedman; Rachel M Bartlett; Samir S Taneja; Yu-Shin Ding; Jean Logan
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.794

3.  Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric MRI: A Comparison of 1 M-Concentration Gadobutrol with 0.5 M-Concentration Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Takeshi Hara; Takeshi Ogata; Hiroko Wada; Takayuki Yabuki; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2018-03-30

Review 4.  Gadobutrol: A Review in Contrast-Enhanced MRI and MRA.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.859

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.