| Literature DB >> 23888282 |
Shariq A Khan1, Owoicho Adogwa, Tong J Gan, Ulysses T Null, Terence Verla, Sankalp Gokhale, William D White, Gavin W Britz, Ali R Zomorodi, Michael L James, David L McDonagh.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 in 0.9% Sodium Chloride (Voluven®; 6% HES 130/0.4) is a colloid often used for fluid resuscitation in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), despite a lack of safety data for this use. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of 6% HES 130/0.4 on major complications associated with SAH.Entities:
Keywords: 6% HES 130/0.4; Delayed cerebral ischemia; Fluid therapy; Hydrocephalus; Hydroxyethyl starch; Mortality; Rebleeding; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Voluven
Year: 2013 PMID: 23888282 PMCID: PMC3717154 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-314
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Demographics and laboratory values between the study groups
| Non-HES group (n=72) | HES group (n=57) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Age (years) | 57 (48–63) | 57 (46–65) | 0.58 |
| Weight (kilogram) | 75 (62.5-87) | 79 (63.5-97.5) | 0.18 |
| Male | 24 (33.3%) | 18 (31.6%) | 0.83 |
| Female | 48 (66.4%) | 39 (68.4%) | |
| Caucasian | 38 (52.8%) | 32 (56.1%) | 0.88 |
| African-American | 27 (37.5%) | 19 (33.3%) | |
| Others | 7 (9.7%) | 6 (10.5%) | |
|
| |||
| No past medical history | 7 (9.7%) | 3 (5.3%) | 0.34 |
| Ischemic heart disease | 4 (5.6%) | 10 (17.5%) | 0.03 |
| Congestive heart failure | 4 (5.6%) | 4 (7%) | 0.73 |
| Cerebro-vascular accident- stroke | 2 (2.8%) | 2 (3.5%) | 0.81 |
| Cerebro-vascular accident- transient ischemic attack | 0 (0%) | 2 (3.5%) | 0.11 |
| Previous history of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | NA |
| Epilepsy | 1 (1.4%) | 1 (1.8%) | 0.86 |
| Hypertension | 40 (55.6%) | 43 (75.4%) | 0.02 |
| Chronic renal failure- no dialysis | 2 (2.8%) | 3 (5.3%) | 0.46 |
| Chronic renal failure- Peritoneal or Hemodialysis | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | NA |
| Diabetes- not on insulin | 2 (2.8%) | 3 (5.3%) | 0.47 |
| Diabetes- treated with insulin | 3 (4.2%) | 5 (8.8%) | 0.28 |
| COPD ( no home oxygen) | 3 (4.2%) | 4 (7%) | 0.48 |
| COPD (home oxygen) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | NA |
| Smoker | 22 (30.6%) | 11 (19.3%) | 0.14 |
| Family history of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage | 6 (8.3%) | 2 (3.5%) | 0.26 |
|
| |||
| Patient not on any home medications | 18 (25%) | 10 (17.5%) | 0.31 |
| Aspirin | 17 (23.6%) | 20 (35%) | 0.15 |
| Clopidogrel | 0 (0%) | 2 (3.5%) | 0.11 |
| Statin | 22 (30.6%) | 12 (21%) | 0.22 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Hunt-Hess grade 1 | 6 (8.3%) | 4 (7%) | |
| Hunt-Hess grade 2 | 36 (50%) | 32 (56.1%) | |
| Hunt-Hess grade 3 | 17 (23.6%) | 13 (22.8%) | |
| Hunt-Hess grade 4 | 6 (8.3%) | 2 (3.5%) | |
| Hunt-Hess grade 5 | 7 (9.7%) | 6 (10.5%) | 0.82 |
|
| |||
| Fisher grade 1 | 4 (5.5%) | 1 (1.8%) | 0.04 |
| Fisher grade 2 | 12 (16.7%) | 2 (3.5%) | |
| Fisher grade 3 | 45 (62.5%) | 47 (82.4%) | |
| Fisher grade 4 | 11 (15.3%) | 7 (12.3%) | |
|
| |||
| Open Craniotomy and aneurysm clipping | 31 (43%) | 32 (56.1%) | 0.14 |
| Endovascular coil embolization | 35 (48.6%) | 22 (38.5%) | 0.25 |
|
| |||
| Hemoglobin at admission (g.dl-1) | 13 (11.6-14) | 12.7 (11.5-14.3) | 0.84 |
| Lowest Hemoglobin during hospital stay (g.dl-1) | 9.5 (8.3-10.7) | 8.3 (7.6-9.4) | 0.001 |
| Platelet count at admission (× 109/L) | 243 (206–283) | 235 (194–272) | 0.59 |
| Prothrombin Time at admission (sec) | 11.9 (11.1-12.8) | 12.2 (11.6-13) | 0.16 |
| Partial Thromboplastin Time at admission (sec) | 26.8 (24–28.8) | 25.7 (23.5-27.6) | 0.26 |
| Serum Creatinine at admission (mg.dl-1) | 0.8(0.6-1) | 0.8(0.7-0.9) | 0.46 |
| Highest Serum Creatinine during hospital stay (mg.dl-1) | 0.9 (0.8-1.2) | 0.9 (0.75-1.1) | 0.70 |
Median (Interquartile Range) was reported for continuous variables and count (%) for categorical variables. Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables.
COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
ARB/ACEI Angiotensin receptor blocker/Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.
NA Not applicable.
Clinical outcomes between study groups
| Non HES group (n=72) | HES group (n=57) | Odds ratio (95%CI) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary outcome | 10 (13.8%) | 19 (33.3%) | 3.1 (1.30-7.36) | 0.01 |
| Rebleeding | 4 (5.6%) | 0 (0%) | 0.54 (0.46-0.64) | 0.13 |
| HCP requiring CSF shunting | 3 (4.2%) | 12 (21%) | 6.1 (1.63-22.95) | 0.004 |
| Delayed cerebral ischemia | 5 (6.9%) | 10 (17.5%) | 2.86 (0.91-8.88) | 0.09 |
Data reported as count (%).
HCP Hydrocephalous.
CSF Cerebrospinal fluid.
CI Confidence interval.
Length of hospital stay, percent creatinine rise, modified Rankin score at discharge and blood product utilization between the study groups
| Non-HES group (n=72) | HES group (n=57) | *p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length of ICU stay† | 10 (8–13) | 14 (11–19.5) | 0.001 |
| Length of hospital stay† | 14 (12–17) | 19 (14–26) | 0.001 |
| 30 day mortality | 11 (15.3%) | 7 (12.2%) | 0.79 |
| Percentage ∆Cr in patients with primary outcome† | 7.1 (0–27) | 12.5 (0–37.5) | 0.74 |
| Modified Rankin score (discharge) | |||
| 0 | 8 (11.1%) | 2 (3.5%) | 0.38 |
| 1 | 26 (36.1%) | 30 (52.6%) | |
| 2 | 14 (19.4%) | 7 (12.3%) | |
| 3 | 7 (9.7%) | 4 (7%) | |
| 4 | 5 (6.9%) | 6 (10.5%) | |
| 5 | 1 (1.4%) | 1 (1.7%) | |
| death | 11 (15.3%) | 7 (12.3%) | |
| Blood product usage‡ | |||
| 5% PPF | 24.31 (119.85) | 26.32 (102.25) | 0.51 |
| PRBC | 184.65 (428.64) | 388.12 (610.98) | 0.006 |
| FFP | 30.67 (131.42) | 82.84 (299.60) | 0.43 |
| Platelet | 34.04 (105.06) | 109.30 (445.32) | 0.57 |
*Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. Data reported as †Median (Interquartile range) ‡Mean (Standard deviation) for continuous variables and count (%) for categorical variables.
ICU Intensive care unit.
∆Cr Creatinine rise.
PPF Plasma protein fraction (Human).
PRBC Packed red blood cells.
FFP Fresh frozen plasma.
Figure 1Forest plot illustrating unadjusted odds ratio of the primary outcome, rebleeding, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), and HCP requiring permanent CSF shunting in the study population.
Figure 2Probability of primary composite outcome with HES use at different levels of lowest hemoglobin.