| Literature DB >> 23888263 |
Wang Jianming1, Lin Qiuqian, Wang Yiyun, Chen Xi.
Abstract
Chinese traditional soybean curd is coagulated by calcium salt. In order to investigate the feasibility of soybean curd coagulation by lactic acid bacteria, we studied the effective factors in soybean curd coagulation when using common soybean curd strains. In soybean curd concentration, incubating time and temperature as well as the inoculated amount and the edible gum additives were studied as the coagulating factors of soybean curd fermented by lactic acid bacteria. Based on the single factor and orthogonal experiment design, the optimized conditions of lactic acid bacteria fermentation curd was determined as follows: soybean curd concentration 12.5%(v/v)and the fermentation conducted at 42°C for 5 hours when the inoculating amount was 4.0% and edible gum additives was 1.4% (carrageenan 1.0% (m/v), soluble starch 0.4% (m/v)). Under the optimum conditions, the water-holding rate of the bean curd was measured as 69.82%, and the gel strength was 25.6 g/cm(2). Compared with the traditional tofu coagulated by calcium salt, our products has less off-flavor and softer texture, which was accepted as new type of soybean curd according to the overall sensory evaluation.Entities:
Keywords: Gelation; Lactic acid bacteria; Soybean curd coagulation
Year: 2013 PMID: 23888263 PMCID: PMC3710577 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Figure 1Effects of soy milk concentration on soymilk curd.
Figure 2Influence from pH value on curd procession of two stains.
Sensory evaluation of the different culture time
| T/h | The average score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color | Flavor | Morphology | Taste | |
| 1 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 3.5 |
| 2 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 3.5 |
| 3 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| 4 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 6 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| 7 | 4.6 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 8 | 4.7 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
Sensory evaluation of two different curds
| Two kinds of curds | The average score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color | Flavor | Morphology | Taste | |
| Soybean curd processed by lactic acid bacteria | 4.6 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Traditional soybean curd | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 3.7 |
Figure 3Effect of temperature on soymilk curd.
Figure 4Effect of different fermentation temperature on soymilk’s water capacity.
Figure 5Effects of strains’ adding amount on soymilk curd.
Figure 6Effects of strains’ mixing ratio on soymilk curd.
Figure 7Effect of edible glue adding amount on soymilk yield.
Factors of L16 (45) orthogonal experiment
| A | B | C | D | E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.5 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 5.0 | 39 |
| 2 | 10.5 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 4.5 | 42 |
| 3 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 37 |
| 4 | 9.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 40 |
* A: soluble solids content/%, B: incubation amount/%, C: edible glue amount/%, D: time/h, E: temperature/°C.
Orthogonal experiment of soybean curd curding conditions
| A | A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.5 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 5 | 39 | 25.6 | 69.82 |
| 2 | 12.5 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 4.5 | 42 | 24.3 | 59.67 |
| 3 | 12.5 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 6 | 37 | 20.4 | 63.05 |
| 4 | 12.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 40 | 15.5 | 48.28 |
| 5 | 10.5 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 6 | 40 | 14.3 | 45.08 |
| 6 | 10.5 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 5.5 | 37 | 16.5 | 44.09 |
| 7 | 10.5 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 5 | 42 | 14.8 | 43.90 |
| 8 | 10.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 39 | 15.7 | 30.48 |
| 9 | 11.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 42 | 16.1 | 40.16 |
| 10 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 6 | 39 | 13.5 | 55.16 |
| 11 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 4.5 | 40 | 12.4 | 52.03 |
| 12 | 11.0 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 5 | 37 | 12.9 | 46.77 |
| 13 | 9.5 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 37 | 13.3 | 43.44 |
| 14 | 9.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 5 | 40 | 13.0 | 34.00 |
| 15 | 9.5 | 5.0 | 1.2 | 5.5 | 39 | 12.2 | 30.85 |
| 16 | 9.5 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 6 | 42 | 12.6 | 42.83 |
*A: soluble solids content/%, B: incubation amount/%, C: edible glue amount/%, D: time/h, E: temperature/°C, F: gel strength/g, G: water holding capacity/%
Extreme difference analysis of gel strength
| G | A | B | C | D | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.450 | 17.325 | 16.775 | 16.575 | 16.750 |
| 2 | 15.325 | 16.825 | 15.925 | 16.425 | 16.950 |
| 3 | 13.725 | 14.950 | 16.300 | 15.200 | 15.775 |
| 4 | 12.775 | 14.175 | 14.275 | 15.075 | 13.800 |
| Extreme difference | 8.675 | 3.150 | 2.500 | 1.500 | 3.150 |
| Better | A1 | B1 | C1 | D1 | E2 |
* A: soluble solids content/%, B: incubation amount/%, C: edible glue amount/%, D: time/h, E: temperature/°C.
Variance analysis of gel strength
| Sources of variance | Sum of squared deviations | F | Ratio of F | Critical value of F | Distinct-iveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soluble solids content | 182.412 | 3 | 24.315 | 9.280 | * |
| Incubation amount | 26.952 | 3 | 3.593 | 9.280 | |
| Edible glue amount | 14.162 | 3 | 1.888 | 9.280 | |
| Time | 7.502 | 3 | 1.000 | 9.280 | |
| Temperature | 24.897 | 3 | 3.319 | 9.280 | |
| Errors | 7.50 | 3 |
Figure 8Effect of various factors on gel strength of soymilk.
Form for sensory evaluation of products
| Index | Features | Deduction | Scores |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morphology | Neat block type, no broken edges, no missing angle | 5 | |
| Irregular block type | 0.1 ~ 1.0 | ||
| Broken edges | 0.1 ~ 1.5 | ||
| Loose | 0.1 ~ 2.5 | ||
| Color | Oyster white | 5 | |
| Slight yellow | 0.1 ~ 1.0 | ||
| Lack of luster | 0.1 ~ 2.0 | ||
| Nonuniform color, and the color is not correct | 0.1 ~ 2.0 | ||
| Taste | Delicate taste, flexible, good toughness, moderate hardness | 5 | |
| Delicate taste, but lack of flexible | 0.1 ~ 1.0 | ||
| The taste is a little rough, a little softer or stronger | 0.1 ~ 2.0 | ||
| Rough texture, obvious grainy feeling | 0.1 ~ 2.0 | ||
| Flavor | Pure and accurate aroma, has the particular flavor of soybean curd gel, and no beany odor | 5 | |
| Aroma is not obvious , or lack of specific flavor of soybean curd gel | 0.1 ~ 1.0 | ||
| Inaccurate aroma and has slightly beany odor that affects the aroma | 0.1 ~ 1.5 | ||
| Bad smell , or full of beany odor | 0.1 ~ 2.5 |