Literature DB >> 23887694

The pain recovery inventory of concerns and expectations: a psychosocial screening instrument to identify intervention needs among patients at elevated risk of back disability.

William S Shaw1, Silje Endresen Reme, Glenn Pransky, Mary Jane Woiszwillo, Ivan A Steenstra, Steven J Linton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To reduce a full psychosocial test battery to a brief screening questionnaire to triage return-to-work strategies among patients with low back pain (LBP).
METHODS: Workers (N = 496) with acute, work-related LBP completed multiple psychosocial measures at intake, then a 3-month follow-up of pain, function, and work status. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to reduce the number of items while maintaining scale reliability, preserving associations with outcomes, and maintaining separation between patient subgroups.
RESULTS: The pool of items was trimmed from 129 to 46 items, describing elements of emotional distress, pain beliefs, organizational support, and activity limitation. A confirmatory cluster analysis replicated previous findings of three risk subgroups: distressed, avoidant, and lacking employer support.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduced measure is a reliable and valid screening measure that can be used to identify early intervention needs among working adults with LBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23887694     DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318289ee6c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  8 in total

1.  Using Predictive Analytics for Early Identification of Short-Term Disability Claimants Who Exhaust Their Benefits.

Authors:  Kara Contreary; Yonatan Ben-Shalom; Brian Gifford
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-12

2.  Perspectives from Employers, Insurers, Lawyers and Healthcare Providers on Factors that Influence Workers' Return-to-Work Following Surgery for Non-Traumatic Upper Extremity Conditions.

Authors:  Susan E Peters; Michel W Coppieters; Mark Ross; Venerina Johnston
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-09

Review 3.  Expectations for Return to Work Predict Return to Work in Workers with Low Back Pain: An Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Victoria Sullivan; Maria N Wilson; Douglas P Gross; Ole Kudsk Jensen; William S Shaw; Ivan A Steenstra; Jill A Hayden
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-12

4.  Returning to work following low back pain: towards a model of individual psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Elyssa Besen; Amanda E Young; William S Shaw
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-03

5.  Work-Related Factors Considered by Sickness-Absent Employees When Estimating Timeframes for Returning to Work.

Authors:  Amanda E Young; YoonSun Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Multidimensional screening for predicting pain problems in adults: a systematic review of screening tools and validation studies.

Authors:  Elke Veirman; Dimitri M L Van Ryckeghem; Annick De Paepe; Olivia J Kirtley; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-09-11

7.  Subgroups of Long-Term Sick-Listed Based on Prognostic Return to Work Factors Across Diagnoses: A Cross-Sectional Latent Class Analysis.

Authors:  Martin Inge Standal; Lene Aasdahl; Chris Jensen; Vegard Stolsmo Foldal; Roger Hagen; Egil Andreas Fors; Marit Solbjør; Odin Hjemdal; Margreth Grotle; Ingebrigt Meisingset
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2020-10-14

Review 8.  Clinical Decision Support Tools for Selecting Interventions for Patients with Disabling Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Susan Armijo-Olivo; William S Shaw; Kelly Williams-Whitt; Nicola T Shaw; Jan Hartvigsen; Ziling Qin; Christine Ha; Linda J Woodhouse; Ivan A Steenstra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2016-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.