BACKGROUND: The obesity paradox has been demonstrated postoperatively in several surgical populations, but only a few studies have reported long-term survival. This study evaluates the presence of the obesity paradox in a general surgery population, reporting both postoperative and long-term survival. METHODS: This retrospective study included 10,427 patients scheduled for elective, noncardiac surgery. Patients were classified as underweight (body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m(2)); normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)); overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2)); obesity class I (BMI 30.0-34.9 kg/m(2)); obesity class II (BMI 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2)); and obesity class III (BMI ≥ 40.0 kg/m(2)). Study endpoints were 30-day postoperative and long-term mortality, including cause-specific mortality. Multivariable analyses were used to evaluate mortality risks for each BMI category. RESULTS: Within 30 days after surgery, 353 (3.4 %) patients died. Overweight was the only category associated with postoperative mortality, showing improved survival [odds ratio 0.7; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.6-0.9]. During the long-term follow-up 4,884 (47 %) patients died. Underweight patients had the highest mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) 1.4; 95 % CI 1.2-1.6), particularly due to high cancer-related deaths. In contrast, overweight and obese patients demonstrated improved survival (overweight: HR 0.8, 95 % CI 0.8-0.9; obesity class I: HR 0.7, 95 % CI 0.7-0.8; obesity class II: HR 0.7, 95 % CI 0.6-0.9; obesity class III: HR 0.7, 95 % CI 0.5-1.0), mainly because of a strongly reduced risk of cancer-related death. CONCLUSIONS: In this surgical population the obesity paradox was validated at the long term, mainly because of decreased cancer-related deaths among obese patients.
BACKGROUND: The obesity paradox has been demonstrated postoperatively in several surgical populations, but only a few studies have reported long-term survival. This study evaluates the presence of the obesity paradox in a general surgery population, reporting both postoperative and long-term survival. METHODS: This retrospective study included 10,427 patients scheduled for elective, noncardiac surgery. Patients were classified as underweight (body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m(2)); normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)); overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2)); obesity class I (BMI 30.0-34.9 kg/m(2)); obesity class II (BMI 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2)); and obesity class III (BMI ≥ 40.0 kg/m(2)). Study endpoints were 30-day postoperative and long-term mortality, including cause-specific mortality. Multivariable analyses were used to evaluate mortality risks for each BMI category. RESULTS: Within 30 days after surgery, 353 (3.4 %) patients died. Overweight was the only category associated with postoperative mortality, showing improved survival [odds ratio 0.7; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.6-0.9]. During the long-term follow-up 4,884 (47 %) patients died. Underweight patients had the highest mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) 1.4; 95 % CI 1.2-1.6), particularly due to high cancer-related deaths. In contrast, overweight and obesepatients demonstrated improved survival (overweight: HR 0.8, 95 % CI 0.8-0.9; obesity class I: HR 0.7, 95 % CI 0.7-0.8; obesity class II: HR 0.7, 95 % CI 0.6-0.9; obesity class III: HR 0.7, 95 % CI 0.5-1.0), mainly because of a strongly reduced risk of cancer-related death. CONCLUSIONS: In this surgical population the obesity paradox was validated at the long term, mainly because of decreased cancer-related deaths among obesepatients.
Authors: Abel Romero-Corral; Victor M Montori; Virend K Somers; Josef Korinek; Randal J Thomas; Thomas G Allison; Farouk Mookadam; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-08-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Daniel L Davenport; Eleftherios S Xenos; Patrick Hosokawa; Jacob Radford; William G Henderson; Eric D Endean Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2008-11-22 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Anne Berghöfer; Tobias Pischon; Thomas Reinhold; Caroline M Apovian; Arya M Sharma; Stefan N Willich Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2008-06-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Mark K Ferguson; Hae Kyung Im; Sydeaka Watson; Elizabeth Johnson; Christopher H Wigfield; Wickii T Vigneswaran Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Jesse Roth; Navneet Sahota; Priya Patel; Syed Faizan Mehdi; Mohammad Masum Wiese; Hafiz B Mahboob; Michelle Bravo; Daniel J Eden; Muhammad A Bashir; Amrat Kumar; Farah Alsaati; Irwin J Kurland; Wunnie Brima; Ann Danoff; Alessandra L Szulc; Valentin A Pavlov; Kevin J Tracey; Huan Yang Journal: Mol Med Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Lisette M Vernooij; Wilton A van Klei; Karel Gm Moons; Toshihiko Takada; Judith van Waes; Johanna Aag Damen Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-12-21
Authors: Zachary C Dietch; Therese M Duane; Charles H Cook; Patrick J O'Neill; Reza Askari; Lena M Napolitano; Nicholas Namias; Christopher M Watson; Daniel L Dent; Brandy L Edwards; Puja M Shah; Christopher A Guidry; Stephen W Davies; Rhett N Willis; Robert G Sawyer Journal: Surg Infect (Larchmt) Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 2.150
Authors: Fausto Petrelli; Alessio Cortellini; Alice Indini; Gianluca Tomasello; Michele Ghidini; Olga Nigro; Massimiliano Salati; Lorenzo Dottorini; Alessandro Iaculli; Antonio Varricchio; Valentina Rampulla; Sandro Barni; Mary Cabiddu; Antonio Bossi; Antonio Ghidini; Alberto Zaniboni Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-03-01
Authors: E K M Tjeertes; Elke E K M Tjeertes; S E Hoeks; Sanne S E Hoeks; S B J Beks; Sabine S B J C Beks; T M Valentijn; Tabita T M Valentijn; A G M Hoofwijk; Anton A G M Hoofwijk; R J Stolker; Robert Jan R J Stolker Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 2.217